8000 Collaboration SpectralDNS / Fluidsim ? · Issue #30 · spectralDNS/spectralDNS · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content
Collaboration SpectralDNS / Fluidsim ? #30
Open
@paugier

Description

@paugier

Hi,

I'm Pierre Augier, one of the authors of Fluidsim (see http://fluidsim.readthedocs.io/ and http://fluiddyn.readthedocs.io/).

Fluidsim and SpectralDNS are two very similar projects (while Dedalus is technically different). I think both projects would benefit from collaborations between their developers.

In an ideal Python world, I guess it would be better to have only one stronger Python code doing spectral DNS (with more developers and more users). I also see how difficult merging such projects could be.

However, I think we could think about the weaknesses and strengths of both projects, and see how we could collaborate and use common code. For example, FluidFFT could be able to use mpi4py-fft and SpectralDNS could use FluidFFT.

Transonic (http://transonic.readthedocs.io/) is also a nice project created mainly for Fluidsim / FluidFFT, which could be used by SpectralDNS.

I think we (Fluidsim devs) should improve our time stepping code. We could also have common code for that.

I really think a good collaboration between us would make both projects stronger.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      0