8000 [Feature Request] Enable pagination on list namespaces · Issue #394 · temporalio/tcld · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

[Feature Request] Enable pagination on list namespaces #394

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
gabizou opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[Feature Request] Enable pagination on list namespaces #394

gabizou opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@gabizou
Copy link
Contributor
gabizou commented Oct 10, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I'd like to use pagination when it comes to listing namespaces (enabling --size arguments)

Additional context

The current protogen files suggest we can leverage sizes, so making use of it in the command layer would be great.

@gabizou gabizou added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 10, 2024
@shakeelrao
Copy link
Contributor
shakeelrao commented Jan 27, 2025

Hey @gabizou, thanks for the feature request!

Just wanted to understand your use-case a little more: does the current tcld namespace list functionality not meet your needs (paginating them before printing to stdout)?

It's a pretty straightforward to add explicit pagination, but just curious -- let me know!

@gabizou
Copy link
Contributor Author
gabizou commented Mar 27, 2025

Just to get back to this, at the time the care was to being able to use filtering and page tokens where possible, not having to paginate the CLI in a script would've been the reason. The particular use case at the time was as I was bootstrapping cloud automation for various environments and teams having namespaces, with service account api-key management in mind as well (reason for #397).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
0