8000 Mismatch Between Gaze360 Annotations and Downloaded Dataset Structure · Issue #3 · thohemp/nitec · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Mismatch Between Gaze360 Annotations and Downloaded Dataset Structure #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
huangyctw opened this issue Apr 15, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Mismatch Between Gaze360 Annotations and Downloaded Dataset Structure #3

huangyctw opened this issue Apr 15, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@huangyctw
Copy link

We're re-implementing the method using this repo and encountered a mismatch between the provided Gaze360 annotations and the dataset downloaded from the official Gaze360 site. The original dataset stores repeated head/body images in a shared folder structure. Your annotations reference different filenames, including paths with Face/, which do not exist in the original structure.

Questions:

  1. How are the annotation filenames mapped to the official Gaze360 dataset?
  2. Is there a preprocessing step or script that restructures the dataset?
  3. Did we miss any dataset preparation details not mentioned in the paper?

The paper (p.4439) only explains how 3D gaze vectors are converted to 2D, but doesn’t clarify this filename/folder mapping.

Thanks in advance.
@thohemp
Copy link
Owner
thohemp commented Apr 17, 2025

We used the preprocessing from this site: https://phi-ai.buaa.edu.cn/Gazehub/3D-dataset/
Following their procedure should lead to the same output structure as used in this work, shown here: https://phi-ai.buaa.edu.cn/Gazehub/Guideline/FaceBased/Gaze360.pdf
I hope this helps.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@thohemp @huangyctw
0