Swift: incorrect access level information #52
Comments
|
The first version of our parser focused on enriching and searching code snippets so we are aware it misses some information if there is no code section relevant. We can easily add informational content in addition to code blocks, but I am a little worried that when we add text blocks then the efficiency of the code based system might decrease. Another idea might be providing two separate functionality: The current system is built for 1, with assumption that 2 is already done by web search by LLMs. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I tried using context7 in Claude Desktop to ask: “Is there a
packageaccess level in the Swift language?”Claude correctly used resolve-library-id (and found
/swiftlang/swift) and get-library-docs to query the data (topic:access control), but the response from context7 was lacking info about package access level.After that, I refreshed the Swift library, but the result remained the same.
Finally, I asked Claude to use
tavilyto verify the answer. It then found that the package access level does exist and corrected the previous response.How is it possible that specific access level was missing, when Access Control page of Swift documentation clearly states this level?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: