8000 CATROID-1619: Added CLT for Goto_ brick in Motion Category by naveen106 · Pull Request #5088 · Catrobat/Catroid · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

CATROID-1619: Added CLT for Goto_ brick in Motion Category #5088

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

CATROID-1619: Added CLT for Goto_ brick in Motion Category #5088

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

naveen106
Copy link
Contributor
@naveen106 naveen106 commented Apr 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

An object which initially moves to a random position 2 times (2 times for certainty).
You can touch on screen and it should move to touch position.

goto__random position: comparing previous position values with position values after GoTo_randomPostion block is executed.
goto_touchPostion: comparing touch position with the position of actor/object after it moves to touch position (rounded off position numbers).

https://catrobat.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/CATROID/issues/CATROID-1619

Your checklist for this pull request

Please review the contributing guidelines and wiki pages of this repository.

  • Include the name of the Jira ticket in the PR’s title
  • Include a summary of the changes plus the relevant context
  • Choose the proper base branch (develop)
  • Confirm that the changes follow the project’s coding guidelines
  • Verify that the changes generate no compiler or linter warnings
  • Perform a self-review of the changes
  • Verify to commit no other files than the intentionally changed ones
  • Include reasonable and readable tests verifying the added or changed behavior
  • Confirm that new and existing unit tests pass locally
  • Check that the commits’ message style matches the project’s guideline
  • Stick to the project’s gitflow workflow
  • Verify that your changes do not have any conflicts with the base branch
  • [] After the PR, verify that all CI checks have passed
  • [] Post a message in the catroid-stage or catroid-ide Slack channel and ask for a code reviewer

@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@naveen106
Copy link
Contributor Author
naveen106 commented Apr 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@ratschillerp I noticed that MuhamedMurica is already assigned this. But since this issue is not done, can you check this and merge (or inform if there's any problem). I'll be careful next time when working on an issue and check if a person is already assigned.

@TIMEXYZO
Copy link

Please consider my demands,

add touches any object in formula editor,

add object ( actor or character [in game] ) detection commands and bricks,

add line break option for variable brick

store this variable on this device is not working ( Android 11+) on latest versions of pocket code because of missing FULL STORAGE ACCESS permission in manifest.xml file

@naveen106
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please consider my demands,

add touches any object in formula editor,

add object ( actor or character [in game] ) detection commands and bricks,

add line break option for variable brick

store this variable on this device is not working ( Android 11+) on latest versions of pocket code because of missing FULL STORAGE ACCESS permission in manifest.xml file

ah! I didn't think of Android 11+ from permission perspective! I'll look into your observation and correct this. Thanks!

@reichli reichli self-assigned this May 2, 2025
@naveen106
Copy link
Contributor Author

@reichli You're working on this? Or should I continue forward to correct it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@reichli reichli

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@naveen106 @TIMEXYZO @reichli
0