8000 Add clarity around the gunicorn.workers definitions by jhgilbert · Pull Request #20547 · DataDog/integrations-core · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Add clarity around the gunicorn.workers definitions #20547

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 23, 2025
Merged

Add clarity around the gunicorn.workers definitions #20547

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 23, 2025

Conversation

jhgilbert
Copy link
Contributor
@jhgilbert jhgilbert commented Jun 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

What does this PR do?

DOCS-10879, a customer requested more clarity around the gunicorn.workers definition.

Local preview:
Screenshot 2025-06-20 at 1 31 53 PM

Motivation

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

@jhgilbert jhgilbert requested a review from Kyle-Neale June 18, 2025 19:41
@jhgilbert jhgilbert requested review from a team as code owners June 18, 2025 19:41
Kyle-Neale
Kyle-Neale previously approved these changes Jun 18, 2025
View reviewed changes
jhgilbert
jhgilbert commented Jun 18, 2025
View reviewed changes
@temporal-github-worker-1 temporal-github-worker-1 bot dismissed Kyle-Neale’s stale review June 18, 2025 19:44

Review from Kyle-Neale is dismissed. Related teams and files:

  • agent-integrations
    • gunicorn/metadata.csv
@codecov Codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.13%. Comparing base (55b500b) to head (8d30da9).
Report is 24 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
activemq ?
cassandra ?
gunicorn 93.28% <ø> (ø)
hive ?
hivemq ?
hudi ?
ignite ?
jboss_wildfly ?
kafka ?
presto ?
solr ?
weblogic ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

hestonhoffman
hestonhoffman approved these changes Jun 20, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor
@hestonhoffman hestonhoffman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TY for the screenshot

@jhgilbert jhgilbert added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 1a00621 Jun 23, 2025
49 of 54 checks passed
@jhgilbert jhgilbert deleted the jen.gilbert/DOCS-10879-gunicorn-verbiage branch June 23, 2025 22:53
Kyle-Neale pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
@jhgilbert @Kyle-Neale
Add clarity around the gunicorn.workers definitions (#20547)
0aa0967 
* Add clarity around the gunicorn.workers definitions

* Update gunicorn/metadata.csv
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hestonhoffman hestonhoffman hestonhoffman approved these changes

@sarah-witt sarah-witt sarah-witt approved these changes

@Kyle-Neale Kyle-Neale Kyle-Neale left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
agent/approved docs/approved ecosystems/review-requested integration/gunicorn product/review-requested team/agent-integrations team/documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@jhgilbert @hestonhoffman @sarah-witt @Kyle-Neale
0