8000 feature: Add Support for Avalon Nano 3s by PixelByProxy · Pull Request #329 · UpstreamData/pyasic · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

feature: Add Support for Avalon Nano 3s #329

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 12, 2025
Merged

feature: Add Support for Avalon Nano 3s #329

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 12, 2025

Conversation

PixelByProxy
Copy link
Contributor

Adds support for Avalon Nano3s.

Example output:
image

@b-rowan b-rowan merged commit 83035a8 into UpstreamData:master Apr 12, 2025
3 checks passed
@PixelByProxy PixelByProxy mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2025
Closed
@PixelByProxy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @b-rowan, I've noticed that hass-miner is expecting the temperature to be in Celsius, but the Nano3s is returning the value in Fahrenheit. Is it expected to return the value in Celsius from this library? The Nano3s is my only miner, so I don't have anything to compare it to.

@b-rowan
Copy link
Collaborator
b-rowan commented Apr 14, 2025

Hey @b-rowan, I've noticed that hass-miner is expecting the temperature to be in Celsius, but the Nano3s is returning the value in Fahrenheit. Is it expected to return the value in Celsius from this library? The Nano3s is my only miner, so I don't have anything to compare it to.

I don't think I've ever specified this value as being in Celsius, but AFAIU everyone else reports it in C, so probably a good idea for me to put that down somewhere...

@PixelByProxy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @b-rowan, I've noticed that hass-miner is expecting the temperature to be in Celsius, but the Nano3s is returning the value in Fahrenheit. Is it expected to return the value in Celsius from this library? The Nano3s is my only miner, so I don't have anything to compare it to.

I don't think I've ever specified this value as being in Celsius, but AFAIU everyone else reports it in C, so probably a good idea for me to put that down somewhere...

@b-rowan actually, I think this was a user issue on my side. It does appear to be output as Celsius.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@b-rowan b-rowan b-rowan approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@PixelByProxy @b-rowan
0