8000 fix: Use .contains() method where available by mathbunnyru · Pull Request #2277 · XRPLF/clio · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

fix: Use .contains() method where available #2277

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2025

Conversation

mathbunnyru
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@mathbunnyru mathbunnyru merged commit 5cdd8a6 into XRPLF:develop Jul 1, 2025
20 checks passed
Copy link
codecov bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 62.50000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.21%. Comparing base (8abc9c6) to head (7ecc1fc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/app/CliArgs.cpp 66.66% 0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
src/feed/impl/TransactionFeed.cpp 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2277      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    73.21%   73.21%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          372      372              
  Lines        15246    15245       -1     
  Branches      7715     7715              
===========================================
- Hits         11162    11161       -1     
  Misses        1932     1932              
  Partials      2152     2152              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0