8000 Question about sharing models in Model-Zoo · Issue #994 · Xilinx/Vitis-AI · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Question about sharing models in Model-Zoo #994

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
daniperfer opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Question about sharing models in Model-Zoo #994

daniperfer opened this issue Aug 30, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@daniperfer
Copy link

Hi:

Looking at the wide variety of models that are in the model zoo, a question has come to me:

Could anyone upload a new model to the model zoo?
If I would be able to train and test a certain model for a specific task with a custom dataset, could I share the model through the model zoo?
Is it open for that kind of contributions?
Are there some minimum requirements (source codes, target boards, etc.) for a model to be shared through the model zoo?

@wangxd-xlnx
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @daniperfer

Thanks for your message. For open model zoo, we believe it's a good idea. We were considering setting up an open model zoo for user to upload and share their own models.

However, considering that the uploaded model needs to be verified, especially the verification of the entire deployment process, an appropriate standard or minimum requirements need to be developed.

Open model zoo module may be added in subsequent versions, please stay tuned.

@daniperfer
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your answer.

Just a follow up question: Do you have a estimated data for that future "open" model zoo, or a hint about what type of requirements a model will need to meet in order to be shareable there?
Thanks.

@daniperfer daniperfer reopened this Sep 20, 2022
@wangxd-xlnx
Copy link
Contributor

Since the exact rules have not been determined, all I can think of is that should have a relatively standardized folder structure similar to the currently released model. It is best to provide float models, quantized models, test code, ’readme‘, and even better if there is training code.

@qianglin-xlnx
Copy link
Contributor

Closing since no activity for more than 2 weeks, please reopen if you still have question, thanks

janifer112x added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2023
* update url of replace_pytorch.sh

* fix the docker install html link (#994)

Co-authored-by: qiuyuny <qiuyuny@xilinx.com>

Co-authored-by: niuxj <niuxj@xilinx.com>
Co-authored-by: qiuyuny <qiuyuny@xilinx.com>
janifer112x added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2023
* update url of replace_pytorch.sh

* fix the docker install html link (#994)

Co-authored-by: qiuyuny <qiuyuny@xilinx.com>

* 3.0 docker fix (#996)

Co-authored-by: qiuyuny <qiuyuny@xilinx.com>
janifer112x added a commit to janifer112x/Vitis-AI that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2023
* update url of replace_pytorch.sh

* fix the docker install html link (Xilinx#994)

Co-authored-by: qiuyuny <qiuyuny@xilinx.com>

Co-authored-by: niuxj <niuxj@xilinx.com>
Co-authored-by: qiuyuny <qiuyuny@xilinx.com>
Former-commit-id: 89d5080
janifer112x added a commit to janifer112x/Vitis-AI that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2023
* update url of replace_pytorch.sh

* fix the docker install html link (Xilinx#994)

Co-authored-by: qiuyuny <qiuyuny@xilinx.com>

* 3.0 docker fix (Xilinx#996)

Co-authored-by: qiuyuny <qiuyuny@xilinx.com>
Former-commit-id: 2057c58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
0