8000 Share Underlying articles by alesisjoan · Pull Request #2 · Yenthe666/knowledge · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Share Underlying articles #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alesisjoan
Copy link
@alesisjoan alesisjoan commented Jun 12, 2024

This PR adds two apps:

  • knowledge_share_underlying: to share all children from an ancestor (tree down)
  • knowledge_share_underlying_with_token: to support knowledge_share_underlying + knowledge_share_with_token.

It works mainly as the following. If an article is shared and set share underlying articles, then all underlying articles are shared too. This allow the possibility of of sharing workspaces instead of sharing one article by one.

It also include some fixings for main app knowledge_share_with_token:

  • don't default access_token, it was making all articles to have an access token even if they're not shared, increasing DB usage.
  • fixes for the left tree panel
  • index for access_token
  • 🔗 link icon for share with token

@alesisjoan alesisjoan force-pushed the share_underlying_articles branch from 09d8b66 to 91a6ff3 Compare June 12, 2024 15:27
@alesisjoan alesisjoan force-pushed the share_underlying_articles branch from 11f2b00 to 4ea672f Compare June 17, 2024 19:01
… with token and it is set to share underlying articles, they're now shared too.
…ge_share_underlying_with_token: added file descriptor
@alesisjoan alesisjoan changed the title [IMP] change share with token icon to link Share Underlying articles Jun 17, 2024
@alesisjoan
Copy link
Author

@Yenthe666 When you get bored or want to blame somebody, maybe you can check this (and rest) PR :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
0