Register BitNetForCausalLM as another spelling for BitnetForCausalLM in utils scripts #213
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This feels like a waste of a good full request.
Microsoft configured their newly released bitnet model as using the
BitNetForCausalLMarchitecture (see) while the conversion script inutilsand other community models refers to it asBitnetForCausalLM(lowercaseN). This just addsBitNetForCausalLMas another valid architecture name to use inconvert-hf-to-gguf-bitnet.pyandgenerate-dummy-bitnet-model.py.Should fixes #193