8000 chore: make function comment match function name by growfrow · Pull Request #5507 · mindersec/minder · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

chore: make function comment match function name #5507

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2025

Conversation

growfrow
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

make function comment match function name

Fixes #(related issue)

Change Type

Mark the type of change your PR introduces:

  • Bug fix (resolves an issue without affecting existing features)
  • Feature (adds new functionality without breaking changes)
  • Breaking change (may impact existing functionalities or require documentation updates)
  • Documentation (updates or additions to documentation)
  • Refactoring or test improvements (no bug fixes or new functionality)

Testing

Outline how the changes were tested, including steps to reproduce and any relevant configurations.
Attach screenshots if helpful.

Review Checklist:

  • Reviewed my own code for quality and clarity.
  • Added comments to complex or tricky code sections.
  • Updated any affected documentation.
  • Included tests that validate the fix or feature.
  • Checked that related changes are merged.

@growfrow growfrow requested a review from a team as a code owner March 16, 2025 16:00
Copy link
@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @growfrow, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request focuses on improving code clarity by ensuring that function comments accurately reflect the function names they describe. The changes involve updating comments to match the corresponding function names in several files.

Highlights

  • Code Clarity: The primary goal is to enhance code readability and maintainability by aligning function comments with their respective function names.
  • Documentation: This pull request falls under the 'Documentation' change type, as it primarily involves updates to comments.

Changelog

  • internal/datasources/service/service.go
    • The comment for getDataSourceReferenceAlias function was updated to match the function name.
  • internal/engine/actions/alert/pull_request_comment/pull_request_comment.go
    • The comment for getParamsForPRComment function was updated to match the function name.
  • internal/engine/eval/vulncheck/review.go
    • The comment for withVulnsFoundReviewStatus function was updated to match the function name.
  • internal/providers/github/webhook/fuzz_test.go
    • The function name FuzzGitHubEventParsers was updated to FuzzGithubEventParsers to fix a typo.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


Trivia time!

What is the origin of the term 'debugging' in computer programming?

Click here for the answer
The term 'debugging' is attributed to Grace Hopper, who, upon finding a moth stuck in a relay of the Harvard Mark II computer in 1947, documented the incident as the 'first actual case of bug being found'.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request aims to improve code clarity by ensuring function comments accurately reflect the function names. The changes appear straightforward and beneficial for maintainability.

Merge Readiness

The changes in this pull request are small and directly address the issue of mismatched function names and comments. Given the low risk and the improvement in code clarity, the pull request seems ready for merging. However, I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.

@coveralls
Copy link
coveralls commented Mar 21, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 56.851%. remained the same
when pulling a489299 on growfrow:main
into 70b1a9a on mindersec:main.

evankanderson
evankanderson previously approved these changes Apr 7, 2025
Signed-off-by: growfrow <growfrow@outlook.com>
@growfrow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reverted and rebased. Please review again.

@rdimitrov
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the contribution, @growfrow! 💯 🥳

@rdimitrov rdimitrov merged commit 1bf5a91 into mindersec:main Apr 14, 2025
34 of 35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0