-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
chore: make function comment match function name #5507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @growfrow, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request focuses on improving code clarity by ensuring that function comments accurately reflect the function names they describe. The changes involve updating comments to match the corresponding function names in several files.
Highlights
- Code Clarity: The primary goal is to enhance code readability and maintainability by aligning function comments with their respective function names.
- Documentation: This pull request falls under the 'Documentation' change type, as it primarily involves updates to comments.
Changelog
- internal/datasources/service/service.go
- The comment for
getDataSourceReferenceAlias
function was updated to match the function name.
- The comment for
- internal/engine/actions/alert/pull_request_comment/pull_request_comment.go
- The comment for
getParamsForPRComment
function was updated to match the function name.
- The comment for
- internal/engine/eval/vulncheck/review.go
- The comment for
withVulnsFoundReviewStatus
function was updated to match the function name.
- The comment for
- internal/providers/github/webhook/fuzz_test.go
- The function name
FuzzGitHubEventParsers
was updated toFuzzGithubEventParsers
to fix a typo.
- The function name
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Trivia time!
What is the origin of the term 'debugging' in computer programming?
Click here for the answer
The term 'debugging' is attributed to Grace Hopper, who, upon finding a moth stuck in a relay of the Harvard Mark II computer in 1947, documented the incident as the 'first actual case of bug being found'.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request aims to improve code clarity by ensuring function comments accurately reflect the function names. The changes appear straightforward and beneficial for maintainability.
Merge Readiness
The changes in this pull request are small and directly address the issue of mismatched function names and comments. Given the low risk and the improvement in code clarity, the pull request seems ready for merging. However, I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.
Signed-off-by: growfrow <growfrow@outlook.com>
Reverted and rebased. Please review again. |
Thanks for the contribution, @growfrow! 💯 🥳 |
Summary
make function comment match function name
Fixes #(related issue)
Change Type
Mark the type of change your PR introduces:
Testing
Outline how the changes were tested, including steps to reproduce and any relevant configurations.
Attach screenshots if helpful.
Review Checklist: