8000 feat(events): add events by Rubilmax · Pull Request #107 · morpho-org/morpho-blue · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

feat(events): add events #107

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Aug 3, 2023
Merged

feat(events): add events #107

merged 22 commits into from
Aug 3, 2023

Conversation

Rubilmax
Copy link
Collaborator
@Rubilmax Rubilmax commented Jul 11, 2023

This was linked to issues Jul 11, 2023
@Rubilmax Rubilmax changed the base branch from refactor/storage-accesses to main July 12, 2023 07:26
@Rubilmax Rubilmax changed the base branch from main to feat/approval-with-sig July 24, 2023 09:42
@Rubilmax Rubilmax self-assigned this Jul 31, 2023
Base automatically changed from feat/approval-with-sig to main July 31, 2023 21:10
@MerlinEgalite MerlinEgalite marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 14:07
@MerlinEgalite MerlinEgalite requested a review from MathisGD August 2, 2023 17:08
@pakim249CAL
Copy link
Contributor
pakim249CAL commented Aug 2, 2023

Sorry I think this idea came a bit late, but now that's there qualified access to events in other contracts starting in 0.8.21, maybe we can just put these events into IBlue? Not blocking. Can be done in a future PR.

pakim249CAL
pakim249CAL previously approved these changes Aug 2, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator Author
@Rubilmax Rubilmax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This works (so I approve), but I'll never be convinced that not internalizing a storage update + its corresponding event is a good practice, especially when it's done twice in the code

@MerlinEgalite
Copy link
Contributor

This works (so I approve), but I'll never be convinced that not internalizing a storage update + its corresponding event is a good practice, especially when it's done twice in the code

Agree

Copy link
Collaborator Author
@Rubilmax Rubilmax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MathisGD MathisGD merged commit 66d0bf3 into main Aug 3, 2023
@MathisGD MathisGD deleted the feat/events branch August 3, 2023 12:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add events
8 participants
0