Fix layout issue in image/surface controls #7618
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7618 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.68% 92.84% +0.15%
==========================================
Files 629 629
Lines 58973 58971 -2
==========================================
+ Hits 54661 54751 +90
+ Misses 4312 4220 -92 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Czaki
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes a minor layout issue for the image/surface layer controls (which use. the colormapComboBox.
I noticed that if the width of the layer controls is changed, the 'colormap' combobox doesn't get resized (because there was a stretch after the control).
I should have noticed in #7600 but clearly missed it.
before
after
References and relevant issues
Description