fix(mirror): wait 15 seconds before sending transactions #10990
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
the test pytest/tools/mirror/offline_test.py often fails with
many fewer transactions observed than wanted, and the logs
reveal that many transactions are invalid because the access keys
used do not exist in the target chain. This happens because some
early transactions that should have added those keys never make it
on chain. These transactions are sent successfully from the perspective
of the ClientActor, but the logs show that they're dropped by the peer manager:
```
DEBUG handle{handler="PeerManagerMessageRequest" actor="PeerManagerActor" msg_type="NetworkRequests"}: network: Failed sending message: peer not connected to=ed25519:Fz7d1xkkt3XsvTPiwk4JRhMuPru4Ss7cLS8fdhshDRj3 num_connected_peers=1 msg=Routed(RoutedMessageV2 { msg: RoutedMessage { ... body: tx GFW8HgTndXVKdcLHdsCXxURjHxDnnEqHadrbxvsLKVQb ...
```
So, the peer manager is dropping the transaction instead of routing it, and
the test fails because many subsequent transactions depended on that one. A git
bisect shows that this behavior starts after near#9651.
It seems that this failure to route messages happens for a bit longer after startup after
that PR.
The proper way to handle this might be to implement a mechanism whereby these
messages won't just silently be dropped, and the ClientActor can receive a notification
that it wasn't successful so that we can retry it later. But for now a workaround
is to just wait a little bit before sending transactions. So we'll set a 15 second
timer for the first batch of transactions, and then proceed normally with the others
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #10990 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 71.33% 71.32% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 760 760
Lines 152284 152301 +17
Branches 152284 152301 +17
==========================================
+ Hits 108625 108633 +8
- Misses 39187 39198 +11
+ Partials 4472 4470 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
saketh-are
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The test pytest/tools/mirror/offline_test.py often fails with many fewer transactions observed than wanted, and the logs reveal that many transactions are invalid because the access keys used do not exist in the target chain. This happens because some early transactions that should have added those keys never make it on chain. These transactions are sent successfully from the perspective of the ClientActor, but the logs show that they're dropped by the peer manager:
So, the peer manager is dropping the transaction instead of routing it, and the test fails because many subsequent transactions depended on that one. A git bisect shows that this behavior starts after #9651. It seems that this failure to route messages happens for a bit longer after startup after that PR. The proper way to handle this might be to implement a mechanism whereby these messages won't just silently be dropped, and the ClientActor can receive a notification that it wasn't successful so that we can retry it later. But for now a workaround is to just wait a little bit before sending transactions. So we'll set a 15 second timer for the first batch of transactions, and then proceed normally with the others