8000 Fix bug in assembly input code by prototaxites · Pull Request #445 · nf-core/mag · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Fix bug in assembly input code #445

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 17, 2023
Merged

Fix bug in assembly input code #445

merged 4 commits into from
May 17, 2023

Conversation

prototaxites
Copy link
Contributor
@prototaxites prototaxites commented May 17, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Realised right after merging that there was a pretty catastrophic bug in the assembly input code 🤦‍♂️ I thought I had figured out the distinction between meta.id and meta.group for the input, but there were filename collisions for a couple of combinations of --binning_map_mode and --coasssemble_group which I had missed...

Fix separates the id and group columns for the assembly input CSV, which should ensure collisions cannot happen, and updated docs accordingly.

Also adds test_binning_entry to nextflow.config, which I had forgotten to do...

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs- [ ] If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/mag branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is against the master branch ❌

  • Do not close this PR
  • Click Edit and change the base to dev
  • This CI test will remain failed until you push a new commit

Hi @prototaxites,

It looks like this pull-request is has been made against the prototaxites/mag master branch.
The master branch on nf-core repositories should always contain code from the latest release.
Because of this, PRs to master are only allowed if they come from the prototaxites/mag dev branch.

You do not need to close this PR, you can change the target branch to dev by clicking the "Edit" button at the top of this page.
Note that even after this, the test will continue to show as failing until you push a new commit.

Thanks again for your contribution!

@prototaxites prototaxites changed the base branch from master to dev May 17, 2023 12:56
@github-actions
Copy link
github-actions bot commented May 17, 2023 •
edited
Loading

nf-core lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit e69a979

+| ✅ 158 tests passed       |+
#| ❔   1 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗   1 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in methods_description_template.yml: #Update the HTML below to your prefered methods description, e.g. add publication citation for this pipeline

❔ Tests ignored:

  • files_unchanged - File ignored due to lint config: lib/NfcoreTemplate.groovy

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 2.8
  • Run at 2023-05-17 15:44:43

jfy133
jfy133 approved these changes May 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member
@jfy133 jfy133 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me

@prototaxites prototaxites merged commit 97a7b31 into nf-core:dev May 17, 2023
@prototaxites prototaxites deleted the fix_assembly_input branch May 17, 2023 18:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jfy133 jfy133 jfy133 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@prototaxites @jfy133
0