exn crosses portable and contended
#4062
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
riaqn
commented
May 29, 2025
goldfirere
reviewed
May 29, 2025
dkalinichenko-js
approved these changes
May 30, 2025
goldfirere
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2025
goldfirere
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2025
riaqn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a temporary workaround that allows
exnto cross portability and contention. To make it safe:portablefunction.uncontended. It becomescontendedinside aportablefunction, unless all the constructor arguments cross contention.