Remove stale comment about continuations order #4165
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bclement-ocp
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Indeed, continuation_handlers is now a Continuation.Lmap since #3887.
mshinwell
pushed a commit
to mshinwell/oxcaml
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recursive continuations are now specified as a
Continuation.Lmap.tinstead ofContinuation.Map.t. Still, it is for now not very important to order in which the continuations are processed independent on things like the name of the compilation unit, because we still never generate more than one recursive continuation.