Integrate a 8000 ll #3
Conversation
- removing libc++ workaround (should be qualified correctly)
|
Thank you so much for your work @Garcia6l20 , this is great. The integrate_all branch here has the purpose to test whether everything combined works as expected. But because everything is mixed in integrate_all, we cannot create nice pull requests for Lewis Baker from integrate_all. Could you please create pull requests towards the topic branches? So the changes in .github/workflows/cmake.yml should go into https://github.com/andreasbuhr/cppcoro/tree/add_github_actions The changes in cmake/FindCppcoroCoroutines.cmake should go into https://github.com/andreasbuhr/cppcoro/tree/add_cmake_support And the changes in include/cppcoro/generator.hpp are not needed any more, as Lewis just merged lewissbaker#156 . I will merge it into the branches on andreasbuhr/cppcoro soon. |
|
Yes I will, thanks to you for managing all of this ! Do you know If someone succeeded in IO implementation using something more usual that io_ring ? Maybe epoll ? |
|
Thanks for bringing my attention to the problem of testing an io_uring backend on Ubuntu. I was not aware of that problem. There is this epoll-backend which we could brush up for a new pull request: lewissbaker#64. Still, it would be nice to have support for both backends in cppcoro. |
|
I just installed Ubuntu 20.10 beta. It has the 5.8.0 kernel. So as soon as Ubuntu 20.10 is widely available, there is a platform for testing. Unfortunately, Ubuntu 20.10 is not an LTS, so let's see whether we'll get it in Github Actions. |
Fixes clang build on github workflow
noexceptspecifier required by clang-12