8000 Use Access Key based authentication via Develocity Connector by runningcode · Pull Request #673 · androidx/androidx · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Use Access Key based authentication via Develocity Connector #673

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: androidx-main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

runningcode
Copy link
Contributor
@runningcode runningcode commented Mar 6, 2024

Proposed Changes

This migrates the access to the Develocity Build Cache to use Access Key based authentication instead
of username and password authentication. This means that the access will use the same access key as is
is used for Build Scan publication.

Here is more information on the Develocity Connector see here

Testing

Test: This should be tested post merge on a CI job that has a proper access key with permission to push to the remote build cache.
This fork does not have the correct credentials.
I did test proper build scan publication against another Develocity instance.

Issues Fixed

Fixes: [Optional] The bug on https://issuetracker.google.com being fixed

@runningcode runningcode requested review from dlam and yigit as code owners March 6, 2024 11:14
This migrates the access to the Develocity Build Cache to use Access Key based authentication instead
of username and password authentication. This means that the access will use the same access key as is
is used for Build Scan publication.

Here is more information on the Develocity Connector [see here](https://docs.gradle.com/enterprise/gradle-plugin/#using_the_develocity_connector)
@runningcode runningcode force-pushed the no/use-remote-build-cache branch from a2c71e9 to 8dfe7f2 Compare March 6, 2024 12:59
@dlam dlam requested review from liutikas and removed request for yigit and dlam March 14, 2024 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
0