8000 Add unit tests for utils/broker by AaronH88 · Pull Request #1315 · ansible/receptor · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Add unit tests for utils/broker #1315

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2025
Merged

Conversation

AaronH88
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 44.15%. Comparing base (c89aaed) to head (7c2ab79).
Report is 4 commits behind head on devel.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #1315      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   43.26%   44.15%   +0.88%     
==========================================
  Files          56       59       +3     
  Lines        9777    10357     +580     
==========================================
+ Hits         4230     4573     +343     
- Misses       5240     5478     +238     
+ Partials      307      306       -1     

see 8 files with indirect coverage changes

Components Coverage Δ
Go 43.84% <ø> (+0.58%) ⬆️
Receptorctl 49.31% <ø> (∅)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

Copy link
Contributor
@lranjbar lranjbar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! :)

@matoval matoval merged commit 06eef5e into ansible:devel May 1, 2025
24 checks passed
arrestle pushed a commit to arrestle/receptor that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0