ORC-1901: Remove threeten-extra exclusion in enforceBytecodeVersion rule
#2234
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dongjoon-hyun
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2025
…n` rule ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to remove `threeten-extra` exclusion in `enforceBytecodeVersion` rule. ### Why are the changes needed? The previous exclusion rule was added at ORC 1.9.0 with Java 1.8. It's not required for Java 17 since ORC 2.0. - #1536 ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #2234 from dongjoon-hyun/ORC-1901. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 1d33d2a) Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
dongjoon-hyun
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2025
…n` rule ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to remove `threeten-extra` exclusion in `enforceBytecodeVersion` rule. ### Why are the changes needed? The previous exclusion rule was added at ORC 1.9.0 with Java 1.8. It's not required for Java 17 since ORC 2.0. - #1536 ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #2234 from dongjoon-hyun/ORC-1901. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 1d33d2a) Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to remove
threeten-extraexclusion inenforceBytecodeVersionrule.Why are the changes needed?
The previous exclusion rule was added at ORC 1.9.0 with Java 1.8. It's not required for Java 17 since ORC 2.0.
How was this patch tested?
Pass the CIs.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.