-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
Fix indexes for 1.7.x
#9752
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fix indexes for 1.7.x
#9752
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Index attributes updated to align with deployment terminology
The attributes for the
_key_piid_riid_rt
index have been updated from resource-based to deployment-based identifiers, which aligns with modern deployment-focused architecture.Let's verify that this change has been consistently applied across the codebase:
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 5420
Inconsistent index definitions: update remaining resource-based indexes
I see the
_key_piid_riid_rt
index inapp/config/collections/platform.php
has been updated to usedeploymentInternalId
anddeploymentResourceType
, but there are still other index definitions that reference the oldresourceInternalId
/resourceType
fields. Please update these to match the new deployment-based naming:• Index on
['projectInternalId', 'resourceInternalId', 'resourceType']
• Multiple indexes with
['resourceInternalId', 'resourceType']
•
_key_resourceInternalId_resourceType
Once these are updated, all platform- and project-collection indexes will consistently use
deploymentInternalId
anddeploymentResourceType
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
those work fine because they have the same attributes. the docker build on local went fine and the stack started fine as well without any errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ItzNotABug Thanks for the clarification. I understand that both naming patterns are functionally equivalent and your local testing confirms everything works properly. While standardizing the naming across all indexes could help with code readability and maintenance in the future, it's not causing any functional issues.
Would you like me to stop flagging these naming inconsistencies in this PR since your primary goal is to fix specific indexes for version 1.7.x rather than standardizing all names?
(_/)
( •_•)
/ >🐰 Curious about your priorities for this PR
✏️ Learnings added