8000 [QA-963] Adding/Updating automationIDs on Login/CreateAccount/SSOLogin views by ifernandezdiaz · Pull Request #1255 · bitwarden/ios · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

[QA-963] Adding/Updating automationIDs on Login/CreateAccount/SSOLogin views #1255

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

ifernandezdiaz
Copy link
Contributor
@ifernandezdiaz ifernandezdiaz commented Jan 10, 2025

🎟️ Tracking

📔 Objective

This work is a subtask of QA-947, a story created to group all the native app views that contain elements without Automation IDs.
NOTE: Not all the elements will require an AutomationID. We are adding the ones we currently need so we can reduce the flakiness on some critical Mobile e2e tests

📸 Screenshots

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

Copy link
Contributor
github-actions bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details2ce5aba1-d8f9-4a44-8902-b240f23fac7b

No New Or Fixed Issues Found

@ifernandezdiaz ifernandezdiaz enabled auto-merge (squash) January 11, 2025 15:33
@ifernandezdiaz ifernandezdiaz merged commit 418e5b4 into main Jan 13, 2025
7 checks passed
@ifernandezdiaz ifernandezdiaz deleted the QA-963/autmationIDS-for-Login-page-elements branch January 13, 2025 14:20
Copy link
codecov bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.43%. Comparing base (96e9560) to head (2777039).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1255   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.42%   89.43%           
=======================================
  Files         725      725           
  Lines       45808    45811    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        40966    40969    +3     
  Misses       4842     4842           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ struct SingleSignOnView: View {
text: store.binding(
get: \.identifierText,
send: SingleSignOnAction.identifierTextChanged
)
),
accessibilityIdentifier: "SSOOrgIdField"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤔 @ifernandezdiaz I believe this should have Entry instead of Field as a suffix => SSOOrgIdEntry to keep it consistent to how we use it elsewhere, e.g. in this PR LoginEmailAddressEntry, LoginMasterPasswordEntry.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0