8000 Let's move cudpp/apps/data/*.dat to a separate repository · Issue #155 · cudpp/cudpp · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Let's move cudpp/apps/data/*.dat to a separate repository #155

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
harrism opened this issue Feb 27, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Let's move cudpp/apps/data/*.dat to a separate repository #155

harrism opened this issue Feb 27, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@harrism
Copy link
Contributor
harrism commented Feb 27, 2015

This data makes it take a long time to clone the repository. It's a pain.
@Laurawly
Copy link
Contributor

Hello Mark,

I've moved the data file to "test" repo.

Leyuan

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Mark Harris notifications@github.com
wrote:

This data makes it take a long time to clone the repository. It's a pain.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#155.

@chrism0dwk
Copy link

Good move, but the build system still expects to find cudpp/apps/data and so fails.

@Laurawly
Copy link
Contributor

Hello Chris,

Thanks for pointing out the error. I just comment out the dependencies on
cudpp/apps/data in CMakeLists.txt and I suppose that we need to turn
CUDPP_BUILD_APPLICATIOINS off if we don't want to test the library.

Leyuan

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Chris Jewell notifications@github.com
wrote:

Good move, but the build system still expects to find cudpp/apps/data and
so fails.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#155 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@chrism0dwk @harrism @Laurawly
0