8000 WIP. Performance regression testing using K6 by orazvaliev · Pull Request #9553 · cvat-ai/cvat · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

WIP. Performance regression testing using K6 #9553

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

orazvaliev
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation and context

How has this been tested?

Checklist

  • I submit my changes into the develop branch
  • I have created a changelog fragment
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • I have linked related issues (see GitHub docs)

License

  • I submit my code changes under the same MIT License that covers the project.
    Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
codecov-commenter commented Jun 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.87%. Comparing base (d738f74) to head (373559a).
Report is 30 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #9553      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    73.79%   71.87%   -1.93%     
===========================================
  Files          448      441       -7     
  Lines        46769    46374     -395     
  Branches      3943     3960      +17     
===========================================
- Hits         34514    33330    -1184     
- Misses       12255    13044     +789     
Components Coverage Δ
cvat-ui 77.70% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
cvat-server 67.24% <ø> (-3.50%) ⬇️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
sonarqubecloud bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot
7.2% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

import { BASE_URL } from '../../variables/variables.js'

function createTask(authKey) {
const { taskSpec, dataSpec, extras } = defaultTaskSpec({

Check notice

Code scanning / SonarCloud

Unused assignments should be removed Low test

Remove this useless assignment to variable "dataSpec". See more on SonarQube Cloud
import { BASE_URL } from '../../variables/variables.js'

function createTask(authKey) {
const { taskSpec, dataSpec, extras } = defaultTaskSpec({

Check notice

Code scanning / SonarCloud

Unused assignments should be removed Low test

Remove this useless assignment to variable "extras". See more on SonarQube Cloud

export default function (data) {
const randomTask = data.tasksData[data.tasksData.length % __VU]
const taskData = APITasks.getTask(data.token, randomTask);

Check notice

Code scanning / SonarCloud

Unused assignments should be removed Low test

Remove this useless assignment to variable "taskData". See more on SonarQube Cloud

export default function (data) {
const randomTask = data.tasksData[__VU]
const taskData = tasks.getTask(data.token, randomTask);

Check notice

Code scanning / SonarCloud

Unused assignments should be removed Low test

Remove this useless assignment to variable "taskData". See more on SonarQube Cloud
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0