8000 Use nano instead of xrb · Issue #2007 · ccxt/ccxt · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Use nano instead of xrb #2007

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
anandanand84 opened this issue Feb 21, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Use nano instead of xrb #2007

anandanand84 opened this issue Feb 21, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@anandanand84
Copy link
anandanand84 commented Feb 21, 2018

It was working fine on verion 1.10.482 but not in the latest. Here is the code.

var ccxt =require('ccxt');
var binance = new ccxt.binance();
await binance.loadMarkets();
binance.symbols.filter(market=>market === 'NANO/BTC') // returns []
binance.symbols.filter(market=>market === 'XRB/BTC') // returns [ 'XRB/BTC' ]
@kroitor
Copy link
Member
kroitor commented Feb 21, 2018

#1853

XRB is the correct code (consistent across all exchanges now). NANO is an older name that was outdated by XRB.

@kroitor kroitor closed this as completed Feb 21, 2018
@rthomas6
Copy link
Contributor

This is not at all clear to me. CMC shows it as NANO?

@kroitor
Copy link
Member
kroitor commented Feb 27, 2018

@rthomas6 yes, but it is outdated, throughout ccxt we use the newer name XRB everywhere, including CMC.

More about it here:

@rthomas6
Copy link
Contributor

NANO is the new name, and XRB is the old name. Nano used to be called Raiblocks with symbol XRB, and they rebranded to Nano, with symbol NANO.

It's not a big deal either way as long as it's consistent, just wanted you to have the info.

Thanks for maintaining this awesome library.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
0