8000 Updates for compatibility with tusd 1.x by acj · Pull Request #3 · chen-anders/tusd-dynamo-locker · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Updates for compatibility with t 8000 usd 1.x #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 17, 2021

Conversation

acj
Copy link
Contributor
@acj acj commented Jan 26, 2021

The 1.x release of tusd introduced a new Lock interface that's separate from Locker. This PR introduces a Lock type that conforms to the upstream interface and makes the locker compatible with newer versions of tusd. I tried to use a light touch on everything else so that the breaking changes are few.

Still testing, but feedback is welcome.

Ohai @chen-anders :) 👋

@acj acj force-pushed the acj/tusd-1.x-upgrade branch 2 times, most recently from 50ce716 to 4d52cb5 Compare January 26, 2021 23:27
@chen-anders
Copy link
Owner

Changes look good, but please rebase so we know that everything still works for sure :)

@acj
Copy link
Contributor Author
acj commented Feb 4, 2021

Huh. I rebased after you merged the new CI workflow, but it didn't run. I can try again. If that doesn't work, maybe we need a pull_request line in the workflow?

@acj acj force-pushed the acj/tusd-1.x-upgrade branch from 4d52cb5 to 5bf0683 Compare February 4, 2021 19:42
@chen-anders
Copy link
Owner

🤔 oh interesting. let me add that then

@chen-anders
Copy link
Owner
chen-anders commented Feb 4, 2021

Just added pull_request events to trigger tests: 31a7a39

It just occurred to me that draft PRs might not trigger test runs.

@chen-anders chen-anders marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2021 19:48
@acj acj force-pushed the acj/tusd-1.x-upgrade branch from 5bf0683 to f2d6d6e Compare February 4, 2021 19:57
@acj
Copy link
Contributor Author
acj commented Feb 4, 2021

I'll post again once I've had a chance to properly test this on our end. There was a bit of yak shaving to do before the actual tusd upgrade.

@acj
Copy link
Contributor Author
acj commented Feb 17, 2021

Looks good on my end 👍

@chen-anders chen-anders merged commit 0f8cbd2 into chen-anders:master Feb 17, 2021
@acj acj deleted the acj/tusd-1.x-upgrade branch February 17, 2021 17:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0