8000 make DefinitionString and DefinitionBody mutually exclusive by tylersouthwick · Pull Request #1390 · cloudtools/troposphere · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

make DefinitionString and DefinitionBody mutually exclusive #1390

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

tylersouthwick
Copy link
Contributor
@tylersouthwick tylersouthwick commented May 8, 2019

make DefinitionString and DefinitionBody mutually exclusive, but allow no definition

from
https://github.com/awslabs/serverless-application-model/blob/master/versions/2016-10-31.md#awsserverlessapi

Swagger specification that describes your API. If neither DefinitionUri
nor DefinitionBody are specified, SAM will generate a DefinitionBody for
you based on your template configuration.

…w no definition

from
https://github.com/awslabs/serverless-application-model/blob/master/versions/2016-10-31.md#awsserverlessapi

```
Swagger specification that describes your API. If neither DefinitionUri
nor DefinitionBody are specified, SAM will generate a DefinitionBody for
you based on your template configuration.
```
@markpeek markpeek merged commit eb66060 into cloudtools:master May 12, 2019
@markpeek
Copy link
Member

Thanks! +1 on adding the test.

davemasino pushed a commit to davemasino/troposphere that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2019
…w no definition (cloudtools#1390)

from
https://github.com/awslabs/serverless-application-model/blob/master/versions/2016-10-31.md#awsserverlessapi

```
Swagger specification that describes your API. If neither DefinitionUri
nor DefinitionBody are specified, SAM will generate a DefinitionBody for
you based on your template configuration.
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0