use fetch options correctly #7838
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@smallst has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
warning eslint@8.57.1: This version is no longer supported. Please see https://eslint.org/version-support for other options. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/views/teachers/JoinLicensesByCode.vue (3)
Line range hint
22-36: Add comprehensive error handlingThe current implementation has two potential issues:
- Missing error handling for complete failures or rejected promises
- Silent 3-second delay before navigation might confuse users
Consider implementing these improvements:
- this.joinByCodes(this.$route.query).then((res) => { + this.state = 'loading' + this.joinByCodes(this.$route.query).then((res) => { let state = 'success' for (const code in res) { if (!res[code] || typeof res[code] === 'string') { state = 'partly-failed' break } } this.result = res this.state = state if (state === 'success') { + this.state = 'redirecting' setTimeout(() => { application.router.navigate('/teachers/licenses', { trigger: true }) }, 3000) } + }).catch(error => { + this.state = 'error' + this.result = { error: error.message } + console.error('Failed to join licenses:', error) })Also update the template to show the new states:
<template lang="pug"> div .progress.progress-striped.active(v-if="state === 'loading'") .progress-bar(style="width: 100%") .alert.alert-success(v-if="state === 'success'") {{ $t('teachers.licenses_activated_success') }} + .alert.alert-info(v-if="state === 'redirecting'") + | {{ $t('teachers.licenses_activated_success') }} + br + | {{ $t('teachers.redirecting_to_licenses') }} + .alert.alert-danger(v-if="state === 'error'") + | {{ $t('teachers.licenses_activation_error') }} + .error-details(v-if="result.error") {{ result.error }} .alert.alert-failed(v-if="state === 'partly-failed'") .status(v-for="(res, code) in result") span.code {{ code }}: span.status {{ res }} </template>
Line range hint
8-14: Add input validation for activation codesThe mounted hook should validate the codes before processing them to prevent unnecessary API calls.
Consider adding validation:
mounted () { - if (this.$route.query.codes) { + const codes = this.$route.query.codes + if (codes && Array.isArray(codes) && codes.length > 0 && + codes.every(code => /^T-[A-Z0-9]{4}-[A-Z0-9]{4}-[A-Z0-9]{4}$/.test(code))) { this.post() } else { + console.warn('Invalid or missing activation codes:', codes) application.router.navigate('/teachers/licenses', { trigger: true }) } },
Line range hint
41-47: Enhance accessibility for status messagesThe alerts should have proper ARIA attributes for better screen reader support.
Consider these improvements:
<template lang="pug"> div - .progress.progress-striped.active(v-if="state === 'loading'") + .progress.progress-striped.active( + v-if="state === 'loading'" + role="progressbar" + aria-label="Loading" + ) .progress-bar(style="width: 100%") - .alert.alert-success(v-if="state === 'success'") {{ $t('teachers.licenses_activated_success') }} + .alert.alert-success( + v-if="state === 'success'" + role="alert" + aria-live="polite" + ) {{ $t('teachers.licenses_activated_success') }} - .alert.alert-failed(v-if="state === 'partly-failed'") + .alert.alert-failed( + v-if="state === 'partly-failed'" + role="alert" + aria-live="polite" + ) .status(v-for="(res, code) in result") span.code {{ code }}: span.status {{ res }} </template>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/views/teachers/JoinLicensesByCode.vue(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/views/teachers/JoinLicensesByCode.vue (1)
22-22: Verify query parameter validation in the Vuex action
While directly passing this.$route.query fixes the options usage, ensure that the joinByCodes action properly validates the incoming parameters to prevent processing of unexpected query parameters.
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show the action is mapped through prepaidsApi, but we need to verify the actual API implementation and any validation. These commands will help us trace the complete flow and validation mechanisms.
The previous search patterns didn't find the files. Let's first locate the relevant files in the codebase to understand the structure better.
We found the API implementation in prepaids.js that shows the endpoint uses POST with query parameters. Let's verify the schema and model implementation to understand the validation rules before making a final decision.
Passing query parameters directly is safe and correct
The change from wrapping query parameters to passing them directly is correct because:
- The API endpoint
/db/prepaids/-/join-by-codesis designed to handle query parameters directly - The schema shows proper validation for codes and teacher activation through the
redeemersandproperties.activatedByTeacherfields - The API implementation in
app/core/api/prepaids.jsalready handles null/undefined options with a default empty object
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the joinByCodes Vuex action implementation to verify parameter validation
ast-grep --pattern 'joinByCodes: function ($state, $payload) {
$$$
}'
# Search for any existing parameter validation patterns
rg -A 5 'joinPrepaidByCodes|joinByCodes.*validate'
Length of output: 1010
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the prepaidsApi implementation to verify parameter validation
rg -A 10 "joinByCodes.*=" app/core/api/
# Also check for any schema or type validation
rg -A 5 "schema.*codes|validate.*codes" app/core/api/
# Let's see the actual API endpoint structure
rg -A 5 "app.post.*codes" server/
Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try finding the API implementation files first
fd -t f "prepaid" -E "test"
# And check for any validation related code in core
rg -A 10 "joinByCodes" app/core/
# Look for API endpoint definitions
fd -t f "routes|endpoints|api" -E "test"
Length of output: 2048
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the schema for any validation rules
cat app/schemas/models/prepaid.schema.js
# And check the actual API endpoint implementation
rg -A 10 "join-by-codes" app/collections/Prepaids.js app/models/Prepaid.js
Length of output: 3427
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/views/teachers/JoinLicensesByCode.vue (1)
Line range hint
28-32: Consider additional error cases in the success check.The current check
!res[code] || res[code] !== 'success'might miss some edge cases. Consider being more explicit about failure conditions.- if (!res[code] || res[code] !== 'success') { + if (!res[code] || typeof res[code] !== 'string' || res[code] !== 'success') {This change would ensure that:
- The response exists
- It's a string value
- It matches 'success' exactly
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
app/locale/en.js(1 hunks)app/views/teachers/JoinLicensesByCode.vue(2 hunks)ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/common/constants.js(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/common/constants.js (2)
15-15: LGTM! Component name follows conventions
The new ACTIVATE_LICENSE constant follows the established naming patterns and Vue component naming conventions, maintaining consistency with the existing license-related functionality.
25-26: LGTM! Page titles maintain consistency
The updates to PAGE_TITLES maintain proper object syntax and consistent naming conventions. The added entry for ACTIVATE_LICENSE aligns with the existing pattern of using snake_case for title values.
Let's verify that the new title is properly defined in the i18n files:
app/views/teachers/JoinLicensesByCode.vue (2)
13-13: LGTM! Dynamic page title setting.
Setting the page title dynamically using constants maintains consistency across the application.
25-25: LGTM! Simplified options handling.
The change correctly addresses the issue by directly passing query parameters to joinByCodes instead of wrapping them in an object with method and json properties.
app/locale/en.js (4)
Line range hint 1-2: LGTM!
The module export syntax is correct.
Line range hint 4-5: LGTM!
The nativeDescription and englishDescription properties are defined correctly.
Line range hint 6-1897: Verify the completeness and accuracy of translations.
This is a very large object containing translations for various keys. I would recommend:
- Ensuring all required keys have a corresponding translation.
- Double checking the accuracy of the translations, preferably with a native speaker.
- Verifying the translations make sense in the context they are used in the application.
Run this script to verify translation coverage:
1898-1899: Verify the activate_license translation.
The activate_license translation is defined, but it's not clear where it is used.
Search the codebase for usages of this translation key:
If no usages are found, consider removing this unused translation.
| @@ -1,13 +1,16 @@ | |||
| <script> | |||
| import { mapActions } from 'vuex' | |||
| import { COMPONENT_NAMES, PAGE_TITLES } from '../common/constants.js' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The imported constants file cannot be found and may be missing
The file JoinLicensesByCode.vue is trying to import COMPONENT_NAMES and PAGE_TITLES from ../common/constants.js, but:
- The constants file is not found at the expected relative path
- The
ACTIVATE_LICENSESconstant is not defined in any of the existing constants files - The component is using
COMPONENT_NAMES.ACTIVATE_LICENSESbut this key is not defined in any of the foundCOMPONENT_NAMESobjects
This suggests that either:
- The constants file is missing
- The import path is incorrect
- The required constants are not defined
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify imported constants.
Using constants for component names improves maintainability. The changes look good.
Let's verify the imported constants exist:
Also applies to: 5-5
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the 8000 analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the constants exist in the constants file
# Expected: Find definitions for COMPONENT_NAMES.ACTIVATE_LICENSES and PAGE_TITLES
rg -A 5 "COMPONENT_NAMES.*=.*{" ../common/constants.js
rg -A 5 "PAGE_TITLES.*=.*{" ../common/constants.js
Length of output: 313
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the constants
# First, let's locate the constants.js file
fd "constants.js" --type f
# Then let's examine its contents for the constants
rg "COMPONENT_NAMES" --type js
rg "PAGE_TITLES" --type js
# Let's also check the actual content of any constants.js files
fd "constants.js" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 22735
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the correct constants.js file that's being imported
# First, let's check the relative path from the component's location
fd "JoinLicensesByCode.vue" --type f --exec dirname {} \; | xargs -I {} find {} -name "constants.js"
# Also search for ACTIVATE_LICENSES constant specifically
rg -A 2 "ACTIVATE_LICENSES.*=.*" --type js
Length of output: 150
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/views/teachers/JoinLicensesByCode.vue (1)
41-42: Consider documenting the timeout increaseThe navigation delay has been increased from 3000ms to 5000ms. While this might improve user experience by allowing more time to read the success message, it would be helpful to:
- Document why this change was necessary
- Consider making this value configurable
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/locale/en.js(2 hunks)app/views/teachers/JoinLicensesByCode.vue(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
app/views/teachers/JoinLicensesByCode.vue (3)
Line range hint 6-20: LGTM! Clean component initialization
The component's lifecycle setup is well-structured:
- Proper initialization of reactive data
- Clear mounted hook logic with page title setting
- Appropriate navigation handling
28-31: LGTM! Fixed options handling
The change correctly addresses the PR objective by:
- Directly passing query parameters to joinByCodes
- Implementing more precise success validation
2-5: Verify the new constants import path
The import path has been updated to ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/common/constants.js. Let's verify this path exists and contains the required constants.
✅ Verification successful
Import path and constants are correctly defined
The import path ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/common/constants.js exists and contains the required constants:
COMPONENT_NAMES.ACTIVATE_LICENSEis defined as'ActivateLicense'PAGE_TITLESincludes the corresponding entry forACTIVATE_LICENSE
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the constants exist in the new path
# Expected: Find definitions for COMPONENT_NAMES.ACTIVATE_LICENSE and PAGE_TITLES
# Check if the file exists
fd -p "ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/common/constants.js$"
# Check for the specific constants
rg "ACTIVATE_LICENSE.*=.*" -A 2
rg "PAGE_TITLES.*=.*{.*ACTIVATE_LICENSE" -A 2
Length of output: 349
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the constants file and search for the required constants
cat "ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/common/constants.js"
# Alternatively, let's try searching with simpler patterns
rg "COMPONENT_NAMES\s*=\s*{" -A 10 "ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/common/constants.js"
rg "PAGE_TITLES\s*=\s*{" -A 10 "ozaria/site/components/teacher-dashboard/common/constants.js"
Length of output: 1448
app/locale/en.js (1)
1821-1822: LGTM! Translation keys added for license activation feedback.
The new translation keys provide clear user feedback messages for license activation functionality in the teachers section. The messages follow the established pattern and style.
fix ENG-1423
the
joinByCodesfunction uses the options asjsonand ready make themethod: POSTso should only use query as optionsSummary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores