-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 636
update language (backport #1263) #1267
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Using "a validator should" instead of 'we' (cherry picked from commit 3d1c36d) # Conflicts: # docs/core/configuration.md
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
docs/core/configuration.md
Outdated
<<<<<<< HEAD | ||
- `timeout_propose` = how long we wait for a proposal block before prevoting nil | ||
- `timeout_propose_delta` = how much `timeout_propose` increases with each round | ||
- `timeout_prevote` = how long we wait after receiving +2/3 prevotes for | ||
======= | ||
|
||
- `timeout_propose` = how long a validator should wait for a proposal block before prevoting nil | ||
- `timeout_propose_delta` = how much `timeout_propose` increases with each round | ||
- `timeout_prevote` = how long a validator should wait after receiving +2/3 prevotes for | ||
>>>>>>> 3d1c36d1e (update language (#1263)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a conflict here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure what the conflict is?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check lines 515, 519 and 524.
These indicate that the section between 515-519 conflict with the lines 519-524.
Both sections describe the same parameters. You need to pick the correct/final version (probably the second) and remove the <<< ==== >>> markers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check what I did in the other back port branch. It had exactly the same problem.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #1263 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of 3d1c36d has failed:
To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refresh
will re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebase
will rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio update
will merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>
will backport this PR on<destination>
branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com