8000 Compare `types.proto` and `feature/abci++vef` and tip of `v0.36.x` by sergio-mena · Pull Request #488 · cometbft/cometbft · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Compare types.proto and feature/abci++vef and tip of v0.36.x #488

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 13, 2023

Conversation

sergio-mena
Copy link
Contributor

Contributes to #10

Only minor renaming needed


PR checklist

  • Tests written/updated
  • Changelog entry added in .changelog (we use unclog to manage our changelog)
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/ or spec/) and code comments

@sergio-mena sergio-mena added the abci Application blockchain interface label Mar 8, 2023
@sergio-mena sergio-mena requested a review from a team as a code owner March 8, 2023 20:57
@sergio-mena sergio-mena self-assigned this Mar 8, 2023
@sergio-mena sergio-mena mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2023
16 tasks
@sergio-mena sergio-mena changed the title Compare types.proto in feature/abci++vef and tip of v0.36.x Compare types.proto and feature/abci++vef and tip of v0.36.x Mar 8, 2023
// agreed_app_data is the bytes that all nodes reach consensus upon in the following height. It is often the hash of the applications' state which can be used to confirm that execution of the transactions was deterministic.
bytes agreed_app_data = 5;
// app_hash is the hash of the applications' state which is used to confirm that execution of the transactions was deterministic. It is up to the application to decide which algorithm to use.
bytes app_hash = 5;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As we renamed this parameter, should it keep the same sequence number of should we give it a 6?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The parameter is new in this branch (doesn't exist out of it)

@sergio-mena sergio-mena merged commit d131ab7 into feature/abci++vef Mar 13, 2023
@sergio-mena sergio-mena deleted the sergio/10-compare-types-proto branch March 13, 2023 15:37
sergio-mena added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
* Move `apphash`from `Commit`to `FinalizeBlock` (leftovers) (#478)

* [partial cherry-pick] abci: Move `app_hash` parameter from `Commit` to `FinalizeBlock` (#8664)

* Removed from proto

* make proto-gen

* make build works

* make some tests pass

* Fix TestMempoolTxConcurrentWithCommit

* Minor change

* Update abci/types/types.go

* Update internal/state/execution.go

* Update test/e2e/app/state.go

Co-authored-by: Callum Waters <cmwaters19@gmail.com>

* Updated changelog and `UPGRADING.md`

* Fixed abci-cli tests, and doc

* Addressed @cmwaters' comments

* Addressed @cmwaters' comments, part 2

Co-authored-by: Callum Waters <cmwaters19@gmail.com>

* Levftover typo in spec

---------

Co-authored-by: Callum Waters <cmwaters19@gmail.com>

* Compare `types.proto` and `feature/abci++vef` and tip of `v0.36.x` (#488)

* CometBFT renaming in types.proto

* AppHash

* Make proto-gen

* Trying 1.20.2 explicitly

* Votes can't have zero height (#511)

* [partial cherry-pick] e2e: programmable ABCI method times (#8638) (#515)

* e2e: programmable ABCI method times

* fix linting error

Co-authored-by: Callum Waters <cmwaters19@gmail.com>

* Pass signatures of vote extensions in `RequestPrepareProposal` (#489)

* Pass vote extension signature in `PrepareProposal`

* make proto-gen

* Verify extensions at PrepareProposal

* Addressed @thanethomson's comments

* Fix vote extension activation in e2e

* ProcessProposal: 1st try

* Working....

* Refactoring

* Verify signatrue in unit test

* spacing

* Addressed @lasarojc's comments

* Fix test

---------

Co-authored-by: Callum Waters <cmwaters19@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
abci Application blockchain interface
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0