Allow custom scripts to be defined directly by its Command
's props/methods
#12403
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Long story short, this allows
Command
subclasses to have complete definitions inside them, instead of splitting the command and description betweencomposer.json
and the class contents.I included this because, otherwise, someone may try to use
setName()
orsetDescription()
and get confused - whilesetHelp()
can still only be defined inside the class.It's also useful when defining a family of script classes, for writing dynamic descriptions, or pairing the description with the long help contents.
I'm just not sure about the change in
Command\RunScriptCommand
- was there a specific reason for it to filter only forScriptAliasCommand
, or could it be simply because there were no other subclasses ofCommand
at that time?Also: I guess we should now rename
$dummy
atConsole\Application
? In fact, when thename
is defined inside the Command, the dummy value ends up being the array key 😂