8000 use map to ensure order of channels when creating index by msarahan · Pull Request #8921 · conda/conda · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

use map to ensure order of channels when creating index #8921

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 12, 2019
Merged

use map to ensure order of channels when creating index #8921

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 12, 2019

Conversation

msarahan
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@msarahan msarahan requested a review from a team as a code owner July 12, 2019 18:41
@msarahan msarahan force-pushed the fix_missing_pkg_type_attr branch from ab9cbc5 to 95fbcef Compare July 12, 2019 19:47
@jjhelmus
Copy link
Contributor

Circle failure is Codecov timeout, not a blocker.

@msarahan msarahan merged commit 3cf5819 into conda:master Jul 12, 2019
@msarahan msarahan deleted the fix_missing_pkg_type_attr branch July 12, 2019 22:34
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi there, thank you for your contribution to Conda!

This pull request has been automatically locked since it has not had recent activity after it was closed.

Please open a new issue or pull request if needed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked [bot] locked due to inactivity label Aug 25, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 25, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@jjhelmus jjhelmus jjhelmus approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@msarahan @jjhelmus
0