8000 revert json iter changes by crosbymichael · Pull Request #2073 · containerd/containerd · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

revert json iter changes #2073

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2018
Merged

Conversation

crosbymichael
Copy link
Member
@crosbymichael crosbymichael commented Jan 29, 2018

This is my bad. It did more testing with this change as well as testing the change with runc, etc and it does not improve performance for us at all and negatively impacts perf in the runc case.

Sorry, but at least this is what git is for I guess.

This reverts commit 4233b87.

Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
This reverts commit 43a9473.

Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
@crosbymichael crosbymichael changed the title revert json itter changes revert json iter changes Jan 29, 2018
@stevvooe
Copy link
Member

LGTM

Copy link
Member
@estesp estesp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@estesp
Copy link
Member
estesp commented Jan 29, 2018

appveyor failure unrelated to this PR revert; merging

@estesp estesp merged commit 0c07626 into containerd:master Jan 29, 2018
@estesp
Copy link
Member
estesp commented Jan 29, 2018

if nothing else, at least the shim drops 400k again, right @stevvooe :)

@stevvooe
Copy link
Member

shim drops 400k again

That's 400kB i thought we'd never get back. :p

@crosbymichael crosbymichael deleted the revert-json branch January 29, 2018 22:03
@crosbymichael
Copy link
Member Author

ya ya ya

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0