8000 docs: Rewrite issue templates for false positives and false negatives by dune73 · Pull Request #3135 · coreruleset/coreruleset · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

docs: Rewrite issue templates for false positives and false negatives #3135

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 13, 2023

Conversation

dune73
Copy link
Member
@dune73 dune73 commented Feb 22, 2023

I have rewritten the two issue templates from scratch. I thought it was necessary to make it clearer what we really need.

@dune73 dune73 requested a review from RedXanadu February 22, 2023 08:44
@dune73 dune73 changed the title doc: Rewrite issue templates for false positives and false negatives docs: Rewrite issue templates for false positives and false negatives Feb 22, 2023
fzipi
fzipi previously approved these changes Feb 22, 2023
Copy link
Member
@fzipi fzipi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Way better, thanks.

Copy link
Contributor
@theseion theseion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very good, thanks!

dune73 and others added 5 commits February 22, 2023 21:35
Co-authored-by: Max Leske <th3s3ion@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Max Leske <th3s3ion@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Max Leske <th3s3ion@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Max Leske <th3s3ion@gmail.com>
@dune73
Copy link
Member Author
dune73 commented Feb 24, 2023

@RedXanadu Are you OK with this wording? If yes, please merge.

@RedXanadu
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the delay in reviewing this…

@dune73 This looks good! The expanded guidance is clearer.

One comment I would make, from a Dev on Duty perspective: if someone is reporting an FP then logs are a "must have", while a curl call is only a "nice to have". It's probably unlikely that users will start submitting reports with no logs and only curl calls, but it's something to think about if that situation does start to happen (I don't think it will, as it takes much more time to craft a curl call than to copy-paste log lines).

Copy link
Member
@RedXanadu RedXanadu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Merging now.

@RedXanadu RedXanadu merged commit 19b63f3 into coreruleset:v4.0/dev Mar 13, 2023
@dune73
Copy link
Member Author
dune73 commented Mar 17, 2023

I see your point on the dev-on-duty needs, @RedXanadu. Let's keep an eye on this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0