New method :isCallExpected #1748
MichalMotyl
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I have some something similar but have used setData for that to set a boolean that I would check in the mock. Using "isCallExpected" feels off since it could be that you didn't expect a call and that is a failure... but you might not notice that anymore when you do it the suggested way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi.
I'm working on embedded project , esp32 based, c++written.
I started implement unit tests and I decided to use Cpputest library because its low footprint.
During my work with UT's I wanted to avoid/limit creating mock classes for some test cases and have choice to call mocked
method or the real implementation. The idea is showed below:
class A {
public:
A(){};
virtual ~A(){};
virtual bool foo(){
return false;
}
}
class B : public A{
public:
B(){};
~B(){};
bool foo2(){return foo()};
}
Then in UT code we could do this:
Case when we want call mocked method:
...
B *x = new B();
x->foo2();
Case when we want call real method doesn't require anything. Jut call x->foo();
What do you thing about the idea?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions