-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Make container and image removal/stop idempotent #8431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
c5232c5
to
9931423
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8431 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 49.41% 49.42% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 153 153
Lines 17142 17156 +14
==========================================
+ Hits 8470 8480 +10
- Misses 7604 7607 +3
- Partials 1068 1069 +1 |
/retest |
9931423
to
04af340
Compare
/retest |
04af340
to
04df85a
Compare
/retest |
/override ci/prow/ci-cgroupv2-e2e-crun |
@saschagrunert: Overrode contexts on behalf of saschagrunert: ci/prow/ci-cgroupv2-e2e-crun, ci/prow/ci-crun-e2e In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
04df85a
to
b98f569
Compare
/test e2e-gcp-ovn |
1 similar comment
/test e2e-gcp-ovn |
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn |
@saschagrunert: Overrode contexts on behalf of saschagrunert: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/retest |
@cri-o/cri-o-maintainers PTAL |
/override ci/prow/ci-cgroupv2-e2e-crun |
@haircommander: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:
If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/override ci/prow/ci-cgroupv2-integration /lgtm |
@haircommander: Overrode contexts on behalf of haircommander: ci/prow/ci-cgroupv2-e2e-crun, ci/prow/ci-cgroupv2-integration, ci/prow/ci-crun-e2e In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/cherry-pick release-1.30 |
/cherry-pick release-1.29 |
@sohankunkerkar: #8431 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.30":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@sohankunkerkar: #8431 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.29":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fully conform to the CRI as well as the new tests from kubernetes-sigs/cri-tools#1536
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None
Special notes for your reviewer:
None
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?