8000 Fix: prevent KeyError when removing 'content-type' header in media up… by lord-dubious · Pull Request #353 · d60/twikit · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Fix: prevent KeyError when removing 'content-type' header in media up… #353

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? 8000 Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix: prevent KeyError when removing 'content-type' header in media up… #353

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lord-dubious
Copy link
@lord-dubious lord-dubious commented Apr 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Fix: prevent KeyError in _stream by safely removing 'content-type' header

  • Changed headers.pop('content-type') to headers.pop('content-type', None) in the _stream function.
  • This prevents a KeyError if the header is missing when streaming.

@sourcery-ai Sourcery AI
Copy link
sourcery-ai bot commented Apr 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request fixes a potential KeyError when attempting to remove the 'content-type' header from request headers. The fix involves changing headers.pop('content-type') to headers.pop('content-type', None) in the streaming and media upload logic. This makes the header removal operation more robust, preventing errors if the header is not present.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Prevent KeyError when removing 'content-type' header by providing a default value to the pop method.
  • Change headers.pop('content-type') to headers.pop('content-type', None).
 twikit/client/client.py
Remove outdated example code from docstring.
  • Delete example loop for iterating through tweets.
 twikit/client/client.py
Perform minor docstring formatting.
  • Adjust indentation in docstring.
  • Change example prefix from '>>>' to '...'.
 twikit/client/client.py
Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Apr 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This update introduces minor non-functional changes to the twikit/client/client.py file. The modifications consist of improvements to docstring formatting, corrections to example code in documentation, and a small adjustment to prevent a potential KeyError when removing a header from a dictionary. No changes have been made to the logic, control flow, or public interfaces of any methods.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
twikit/client/client.py Fixed docstring formatting, updated example code in documentation, and made header removal safer by using pop('content-type', None) to avoid KeyError. No functional or interface changes.

Poem

In the warren, docs are neat,
Indents fixed and headers discrete.
No logic changed, just clearer lines,
Example code now better shines.
A gentle hop, a tidy sweep—
The code is clean, the docs run deep!
🐇✨

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12f744c and 6db76ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • twikit/client/client.py (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
twikit/client/client.py (3)

2374-2374: Docstring alignment improved for edit_bookmark_folder.
The return type annotation is now properly aligned with the rest of the docstring.

4210-4210: Prevent KeyError when popping 'content-type'.
Switching to headers.pop('content-type', None) safely removes the header if present without raising an error when it's absent, making the stream setup more robust.

4258-4263: Fixed example prompts in streaming session docstring.
The example code now correctly uses continuation prompts (...) for multi-line snippets, improving readability and consistency.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and ge 8000 nerate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

sourcery-ai[bot]
sourcery-ai bot reviewed Apr 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @lord-dubious - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider moving the unrelated docstring changes to a separate pull request to keep this one focused on the bug fix.
  • The description mentions a fix for 'media upload', but the diff only shows changes in the _stream function; please ensure all relevant changes are included or update the description.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai[bot] sourcery-ai[bot] left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@lord-dubious
0