8000 Add pagination support to various OpenAPI operations by devkiran · Pull Request #2520 · dubinc/dub · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Add pagination support to various OpenAPI operations #2520

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

devkiran
Copy link
Collaborator
@devkiran devkiran commented Jun 12, 2025 &# 8000 8226;

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced API endpoints for commissions, customers, folders, and tags with improved pagination support, allowing for more flexible data retrieval.
  • Chores
    • Removed unnecessary debugging output from the folders API endpoint for cleaner logs.

Copy link
vercel bot commented Jun 12, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
dub ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 12, 2025 5:46pm

Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Walkthrough

Pagination metadata was added to several OpenAPI operation objects for commissions, customers, folders, and tags by introducing the "x-speakeasy-pagination" property. Additionally, a debugging console log was removed from the folders API route handler. No other logic or control flow was modified.

Changes

Files Change Summary
apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/list-commissions.ts
apps/web/lib/openapi/customers/get-customers.ts
apps/web/lib/openapi/folders/list-folders.ts
apps/web/lib/openapi/tags/get-tags.ts
Added "x-speakeasy-pagination" property to OpenAPI operation objects to specify offset-limit pagination details.
apps/web/app/api/folders/route.ts Removed a debugging console log from the GET handler for fetching folders.

Poem

A hop, a skip, pagination’s here,
Across commissions, tags, and peers.
Debug logs gone, the code is neat,
Now OpenAPI docs are sweet!
With every page, results align,
A rabbit’s touch—so pure, so fine! 🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart sho 8000 wing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (4)
apps/web/lib/openapi/customers/get-customers.ts (2)

12-29: Same duplication caveat as in get-tags.ts

The pagination block is byte-for-byte identical; centralise it to keep specs DRY.


16-24: Confirm location string (“parameters”) is correct

See earlier comment in get-tags.ts.

apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/list-commissions.ts (1)

12-29: Repeated pagination literal

Refer to the suggestion in get-tags.ts for extracting a shared constant.

apps/web/lib/openapi/folders/list-folders.ts (1)

12-29: Repeated pagination literal

Refer to the suggestion in get-tags.ts for extracting a shared constant.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/lib/openapi/tags/get-tags.ts (1)

9-26: Consider extracting the pagination descriptor to a shared constant

The exact same "x-speakeasy-pagination" object appears in four different operation specs. Duplicating the literal increases maintenance cost (e.g., if the parameter names ever change, every file must be touched).

-  "x-speakeasy-pagination": {
-    type: "offsetLimit",
-    inputs: [
-      { name: "page", in: "parameters", type: "page" },
-      { name: "pageSize", in: "parameters", type: "limit" },
-    ],
-    outputs: { results: "$" },
-  },
+  // Share one canonical definition instead of repeating the literal
+  "x-speakeasy-pagination": OFFSET_LIMIT_PAGINATION,

where OFFSET_LIMIT_PAGINATION could live in @/lib/openapi/pagination.ts and be imported wherever needed.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 01aa52c and 3b73e45.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/web/app/api/folders/route.ts (0 hunks)
  • apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/list-commissions.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/lib/openapi/customers/get-customers.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/lib/openapi/folders/list-folders.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/lib/openapi/tags/get-tags.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • apps/web/app/api/folders/route.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/lib/openapi/tags/get-tags.ts (1)

12-21:

✅ Verification successful

Verify the "in": "parameters" value is accepted by Speakeasy

Speakeasy’s examples typically use "in": "query" to indicate query-string parameters. If "parameters" is a project-specific alias that Speakeasy understands, ignore this; otherwise, generated SDKs may be missing the paging arguments.

Run the following to grep for other uses and confirm what value the codebase expects:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Inspect existing pagination descriptors for consistency
rg -A2 -B2 '"x-speakeasy-pagination"' | head -n 40

Length of output: 2238


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Show pagination inputs in get-tags.ts
rg -n '"x-speakeasy-pagination":' -A10 -B3 apps/web/lib/openapi/tags/get-tags.ts

# Show pagination inputs in get-customers.ts for comparison
rg -n '"x-speakeasy-pagination":' -A10 -B3 apps/web/lib/openapi/customers/get-customers.ts

Length of output: 930


No change needed: “in”: “parameters” is the correct Speakeasy alias

All existing pagination descriptors in your codebase (e.g., getCustomers, listFolders, etc.) consistently use "in": "parameters". This is a Speakeasy-specific shorthand for query‐string parameters and will be recognized by the SDK generator—no update to "query" is required.

Copy link
bug0-qa-agent bot commented Jun 12, 2025

🤖 Bug0 QA Agent

Here are the results of the automated tests for PR #2520:

To re-run the tests, please comment /bug0 run or push a new commit to this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
0