8000 docs: update v3.6.0 roadmap by hwdef · Pull Request #19814 · etcd-io/etcd · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

docs: update v3.6.0 roadmap #19814

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2025
Merged

docs: update v3.6.0 roadmap #19814

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2025

Conversation

hwdef
Copy link
Contributor
@hwdef hwdef commented Apr 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I found that these tasks have been completed.

etcd-io/raft#89
etcd-io/bbolt#553
#16007

@hwdef
update v3.6.0 roadmap
799f07b 
Signed-off-by: hwdef <hwdefcom@outlook.com>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @hwdef. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member
ahrtr commented Apr 28, 2025

/ok-to-test

@codecov Codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.60%. Comparing base (6608dfb) to head (799f07b).
Report is 37 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

see 70 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19814      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.47%   67.60%   -1.88%     
==========================================
  Files         406      421      +15     
  Lines       35432    35863     +431     
==========================================
- Hits        24617    24244     -373     
- Misses       9396    10193     +797     
- Partials     1419     1426       +7

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 21a976e...799f07b. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hwdef
Copy link
Contributor Author
hwdef commented Apr 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@ahrtr
Hi, I would like to know how to fix the CI error

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member
ahrtr commented Apr 28, 2025

@ahrtr Hi, I would like to know how to fix the CI error

It isn't caused by this PR.

I see such codecov failure in other PRs as well. cc @ivanvc

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahrtr, hwdef

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hwdef
Copy link
Contributor Author
hwdef commented Apr 28, 2025

Thanks. I see.

@siyuanfoundation
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @hwdef for raising the PR!
/lgtm

@siyuanfoundation
Copy link
Contributor
siyuanfoundation commented Apr 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I am not sure @ivanvc has looked into the codecov failure. Maybe @hwdef can do some investigation first?

@ahrtr ahrtr merged commit a4bbb46 into etcd-io:main Apr 28, 2025
36 of 37 checks passed
@ivanvc
Copy link
Member
ivanvc commented Apr 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I am not sure @ivanvc has looked into the codecov failure. Maybe @hwdef can do some investigation first?

The problem with the failure in test coverage difference is that the post submit jobs are failing for the given branch (i.e., release-3.6, or main). Therefore, the reports are not accurate with the code in the given branch, e.g., #19814 (comment):

Report is 37 commits behind head on main.

The current flakiness looks to be related to #19748 (via #19803 (comment))

Edit: Refer also to kubernetes/test-infra#34381 (comment)

@hwdef
Copy link
Contributor Author
hwdef commented Apr 29, 2025

@ivanvc
Has this problem been solved? Do I need to keep track of it?

@ivanvc
Copy link
Member
ivanvc commented Apr 29, 2025

No, it's not solved; we know the root cause but don't have a solution yet.

@ivanvc ivanvc mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2025
Closed
4 tasks
@ivanvc
Copy link
Member
ivanvc commented Apr 29, 2025

Opened #19835 to track the flakiness issue in code coverage reports.

@hwdef
Copy link
Contributor Author
hwdef commented Apr 30, 2025

Ok, I'll take a look at this problem too and try to solve it, though there might not be a definite outcome :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ahrtr ahrtr ahrtr approved these changes

Assignees

@siyuanfoundation siyuanfoundation

Labels
approved area/documentation lgtm ok-to-test size/XS
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@hwdef @k8s-ci-robot @ahrtr @siyuanfoundation @ivanvc
0