8000 Constraints for maps and records by skogsbaer · Pull Request #109 · etylizer/etylizer · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Constraints for maps and records #109

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

Constraints for maps and records #109

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

skogsbaer
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@skogsbaer skogsbaer marked this pull request as draft August 2, 2024 09:09
@albsch albsch mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2024
@skogsbaer skogsbaer marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2024 14:29
@skogsbaer skogsbaer requested a review from albsch October 9, 2024 14:29
@skogsbaer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@albsch This PR brings support for maps and records. The tests for maps are not active yet, because tally/subtyping is still buggy.

@skogsbaer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@albsch I had to rebase the commits. The PR is currently reject because erlang's stdlib make use of overriding record field types. I will add this feature.

@albsch albsch changed the title constraints for maps Constraints for maps and records Oct 9, 2024
@albsch albsch added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 9, 2024
@albsch albsch self-requested a review October 9, 2024 19:42
@albsch albsch added this to the Full Erlang Support milestone Oct 9, 2024
@skogsbaer skogsbaer merged commit b7c5ad2 into main Oct 11, 2024
24 checks passed
@skogsbaer skogsbaer deleted the sw/map-constraints branch October 11, 2024 09:26
@albsch albsch mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0