-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
⚡ feat: comprehensive test coverage improvements #1846
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
## Description - Create new prompts - Add missing features ## Testing Explain the quality checks that have been done on the code changes ## Additional Information - [ ] I read the [contributing docs](../docs/contributing.md) (if this is your first contribution) Your ENS/address:
- Fix StackError reference to use Stack.Error (correct type) - Fix ExecutionErrorEnum reference to use ExecutionError.Error (correct type) - Maintain consistent error handling throughout EVM module - All tests passing after changes This ensures type correctness and follows Zig idioms for error handling.
- Simplify error type annotations to use inference where appropriate - Use proper @as() casts instead of explicit type annotations for better readability - Fix branch hints for error paths (.cold instead of .likely for catch blocks) - Add proper @throws documentation for functions - Maintain high-performance two-stage safety system and execution patterns All tests passing. VM execution performance and correctness preserved.
- Simplify error type annotations to use inference (!Self instead of std.mem.Allocator.Error!Self) - Fix branch hint placement to comply with Zig syntax rules - Optimize gas consumption with proper branch hints for hot path - Maintain comprehensive documentation and clear error handling All tests passing. Frame management performance preserved.
- Add @branchHint(.cold) for overflow/underflow error conditions - Optimize hot path performance by marking error conditions as unlikely - Maintain aligned memory layout and unsafe operation patterns - Preserve high-performance two-stage safety system All tests passing. Stack performance optimized for common success cases.
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@roninjin10 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (27)
WalkthroughThis update introduces a wide array of new features, architectural enhancements, edge case handling, and documentation improvements to the EVM implementation. Major additions include comprehensive support for EIP-7702 delegation, EOF container format, dynamic gas edge case handling, pluggable database interfaces, advanced tracing, consensus test suite integration, and extensive prompt-driven implementation plans for precompiles, call operations, and more. Documentation and error handling are also significantly expanded. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI
participant Vm
participant State
participant Database
participant Frame
User->>CLI: Run EVM command (exec/state/analyze/bench)
CLI->>Vm: Initialize VM (with config, database, etc.)
CLI->>Vm: Execute operation (e.g., bytecode execution)
Vm->>State: Access or update state (account, storage, code)
State->>Database: Perform database operations (get/set/snapshot)
Vm->>Frame: Create execution frame (with gas, context, edge case handlers)
Frame->>Vm: Execute instructions (with gas, memory, stack, edge case checks)
Vm->>CLI: Return results (output, trace, analysis, etc.)
CLI->>User: Display results
sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant Vm
participant Frame
participant CallContext
participant State
Caller->>Vm: Execute CALL opcode
Vm->>Frame: Prepare call frame (gas, stipend, context)
Frame->>CallContext: Setup call context (addresses, value, input, static flag)
CallContext->>State: Validate call (balance, depth, etc.)
CallContext->>Frame: Deduct gas, apply stipend if value transfer
Frame->>Vm: Execute subcall (recursive if needed)
Vm->>Frame: Return result, update return data
Frame->>Caller: Push success/failure to stack
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 40
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/evm/prompts/implement-complete-call-operations.md (2)
89-119
: Duplicate logic: reusecalculate_call_gas
fromgas/call_gas_calculator.zig
.This implementation re-embeds the 63/64th rule and cost logic already defined elsewhere. Consolidate into a single gas calculator to avoid divergence.
368-375
: Duplicate constant definitions.
CALL_COST
,CALL_VALUE_COST
, etc. are already declared ingas_constants.zig
(implement-call-gas-stipend.md). Consolidate to a single source of truth.
🧹 Nitpick comments (51)
src/evm/prompts/implement-consensus-test-suite.md (1)
208-214
: Parameterize the chain ID instead of hard-codingUsing
Vm.init(allocator, 1)
ties you to mainnet. Make chain ID configurable viaTestConfig
to support other networks (e.g., Ropsten, Goerli).src/evm/prompts/implement-complete-eip4844-support.md (1)
111-114
: Cast literal toU256
for@max
comparison
@max(parent_blob_base_fee * delta / …, 1)
compares aU256
expression to an integer literal. Cast the1
toU256
to avoid a type error.- const base_fee_delta = @max( - parent_blob_base_fee * delta / TARGET_BLOB_GAS_PER_BLOCK / BLOB_BASE_FEE_UPDATE_FRACTION, - 1 - ); + const base_fee_delta = @max( + parent_blob_base_fee * delta / TARGET_BLOB_GAS_PER_BLOCK / BLOB_BASE_FEE_UPDATE_FRACTION, + U256(1) + );src/evm/prompts/implement-cache-optimization.md (5)
6-10
: Inconsistent branch naming vs commit message format
The instructions specify snake_case branch names without emojis, yet the commit message example uses an emoji and kebab-case:
⚡ perf: implement intelligent cache optimization…
Align commit message guidelines with branch naming conventions or clarify exceptions.
3-4
: Improve header hierarchy
The top-level heading (# Implement Cache Optimization
) is immediately followed by workflow instructions. Consider inserting an## Overview
section to outline goals and improve navigation.
18-21
: Clarify scope in Context section
The “Context” paragraph lists high-level goals but omits a concise summary of core components. A bullet list of key modules (e.g.,CacheOptimizer
,AccessPatternTracker
,PrefetchEngine
) would help readers quickly grasp the framework.
24-31
: Use language-specific fenced code blocks for CLI commands
The Git workflow steps use inline backticks for shell commands. For clarity, convert them to fencedbash
blocks, e.g.:git worktree add g/feat_implement_cache_optimization feat_implement_cache_optimization
164-168
: Populate or remove the placeholder “Relevant code snippets” section
The “Relevant code snippets” block is currently empty (undefined
). Either supply useful examples or remove this section to avoid confusion.src/evm/frame.zig (1)
157-173
: Constructor has grown unwieldy – consider a builder or options struct
init_with_state
now takes 15 optional parameters. This is hard to read, easy to misuse, and brittle to future changes.
Encapsulate the options in a separate struct or use a builder-pattern to improve maintainability.src/evm/prompts/implement-bls12-381-g1add-precompile.md (1)
50-58
: Hard tabs trigger markdown-lint; replace with spacesLines inside the explanatory block contain leading tab characters, violating MD010 (
no-hard-tabs
).
Converting tabs to four spaces retains alignment without breaking the code snippet.src/evm/prompts/complete-call-operations.md (1)
48-58
: File paths are written with a leading slash
/src/evm/execution/system.zig
etc. use an absolute-looking path; elsewhere in the repo relative paths (src/…
) are used.
For consistency and copy-paste friendliness, drop the leading/
.src/evm/prompts/implement-blake2f-precompile.md (1)
58-70
: Same hard-tab issue as other prompt filesTabs inside the Go code block raise MD010 warnings. Convert to spaces or add
<!-- markdownlint-disable MD010 -->
before the fenced block if you want to keep authentic indentation.src/evm/prompts/implement-comprehensive-tracing.md (1)
47-96
: Lint: hard tabs in reference snippetThe Go snippet uses tabs; markdown-lint flags these. Consider wrapping the snippet with
<!-- markdownlint-disable MD010 -->
/<!-- markdownlint-enable MD010 -->
or converting to spaces to satisfy CI.🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
52-52: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
53-53: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
54-54: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
55-55: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
56-56: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
57-57: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
58-58: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
63-63: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
64-64: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
65-65: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
66-66: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
67-67: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
68-68: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
69-69: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
70-70: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
src/evm/prompts/implement-ecmul-precompile.md (1)
32-33
: Duplicate use of “Operation”.
The heading “Mathematical Operation” and the bullet “Operation” are redundant. Consider renaming the heading to “Mathematical Details” or removing the bullet label.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~32-~32: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...te coordinates: x, y) ### Mathematical Operation - Operation: P × s = Q (where P is input point, s...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
src/evm/prompts/implement-ecadd-precompile.md (2)
41-43
: Grammar: missing article “the”.
In “Search forbn
andecadd
in revm codebase…”, add “the” before “revm codebase” for clarity.Apply this diff:
-Search for `bn` and `ecadd` in revm codebase for elliptic curve implementations. +Search for `bn` and `ecadd` in the revm codebase for elliptic curve implementations.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...entation Search forbn
andecadd
in revm codebase for elliptic curve implementat...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
278-281
: Grammar: add “to” for consistency.
Change the bullet “Avoid conditional branches on secret data” to “Ensure to avoid conditional branches on secret data” for parallel structure with preceding imperatives.Apply this diff:
-- Avoid conditional branches on secret data +- Ensure to avoid conditional branches on secret datasrc/evm/prompts/implement-database-interface.md (1)
9-10
: Fix commit message formatting.
The commit message is prefixed with an extraneous parenthesis. Remove the leading “(” inside the backticks.Apply this diff:
-4. **Commit message**: `( feat: implement pluggable database abstraction for state management` +4. **Commit message**: `feat: implement pluggable database abstraction for state management`src/evm/prompts/implement-async-database-support.md (2)
5-10
: Inconsistent branch vs commit conventions
The doc mandates a snake_case branch name without emojis, yet the commit message example includes an emoji (✨ feat: …
). Align on one convention—either allow emojis in both branch and commit messages or remove the emoji here for consistency.
379-386
: Avoid busy-wait inawait
Using a simple busy-wait withstd.time.sleep
will tie up a thread. Consider replacing this with a proper event-loop or condition-variable notification to unblock threads efficiently.src/evm/prompts/implement-edge-case-handling.md (2)
315-341
: Panic path doesn’t return
Inhandle_stack_underflow
, the.Panic
branch callsstd.log.panic
but doesn’t return anEdgeCaseResult
. Although panic aborts, explicitly returning or marking itnoreturn
improves clarity.
432-472
: Reconsider wrapping gas on overflow
GasOverflowBehavior.Wrap
can lead to unexpectedly low gas values. It may be safer to clamp to max or error out by default for EVM semantics. Consider moving wrap into opt-in mode only.src/evm/prompts/implement-ecpairing-precompile.md (3)
96-101
: Typo in constant naming scope
The pre-Istanbul constants are suffixed with_BYZANTIUM
, but the base-gas constants use no fork suffix. For symmetry and clarity, align naming (e.g.ECPAIRING_BASE_GAS_ISTANBUL
).
125-136
: Missing cast intwo_ab
calculation
self.c0.mul(self.c1).mul(2)
relies on implicit integer promotions; consider casting2
toU256
for consistency and to avoid hidden truncations.
234-249
: NormalizeFq12
after each multiplication
Accumulating products inpairing_check
may overflow intermediate representations. Add a reduction or normalization step after eachmul
to keep values within field bounds.src/evm/prompts/fix-wasm-build-integration.md (3)
50-62
: ConsiderStaticLibrary
for WASM
Using a shared library onwasm32-freestanding
may bloat startup code. A static library (b.addStaticLibrary
) often yields smaller bundles and simpler linking for WASM targets.
124-142
: No cleanup forvm_handles
on unload
vm_handles
grows indefinitely—add adestroy_all
or module-level deinit to free VM instances when the module is reloaded or unloading.
206-216
: Missing null check inwasm_allocate
Ifallocator.alloc
fails, returningnull
will cause a null-deref in caller. Document or enforce non-nullable pointers, or return0
/error code and handle gracefully in JS.src/evm/prompts/implement-database-interface-traits.md (1)
98-104
: Consider marking vtable wrappersinline
Hot-path methods likegetAccount
andsetAccount
may benefit frompub inline fn
to reduce vtable dispatch overhead in performance-critical sections.src/evm/prompts/implement-ecrecover-precompile.md (2)
145-147
: Verify gas constant alignment
pub const ECRECOVER_COST: u64 = 3000;
matches the Ethereum spec, but double-check against your protocol parameters to avoid mismatch across forks.
287-311
: Detail secp256k1 C-FFI binding strategy
The C FFI stub forrecover_public_key_c
lacks context creation (secp256k1_context
), return-value handling, and memory ownership conventions. Specify which version of libsecp256k1 you’ll link, how you’ll allocate/free buffers, and map errors into Zig’s!
error set.src/evm/prompts/implement-bundle-state-management.md (4)
26-36
: Add documentation comments for public fields.The
StateBundleManager
struct exposes 8000 several public fields (allocator
,config
,active_bundles
, etc.) without inline comments. Brief doc comments per field would improve readability and maintainability.
130-140
: Preallocateactive_bundles
to avoid runtime resizing.The
init
function uses default capacity foractive_bundles
. Consider reserving capacity based onconfig.max_active_bundles
to reduce rehashing overhead under load.
249-258
: Consolidate bundle removal logic.Both
commit_bundle
androllback_bundle
remove the bundle fromactive_bundles
andbundle_stack
. Extract shared cleanup into a helper to reduce duplication and risk of drift.
300-328
: Ensurebundles_to_remove
is deinitialized on all paths.The local
bundles_to_remove
list isdefer
-deinitialized only ifgarbage_collect
completes normally. If an error occurs in the loop, the list could leak. Wrap its scope in adefer bundles_to_remove.deinit();
at the top.src/evm/prompts/implement-cli-tools.md (6)
28-42
: Extract magic constants into named constants.Hardcoded defaults (
30_000_000
gas limit,20_000_000_000
gas price, etc.) inExecutorConfig.default()
would be clearer if defined asconst DEFAULT_GAS_LIMIT = 30_000_000;
and so on.
67-105
: Refactor duplicate error handling inexecute_bytecode
.Both the
catch
arm and the successful path duplicate trace logic. Extract the trace-building into a helper to DRY up the code.
156-174
: Format execution time consistently.
print_summary
logs execution time in milliseconds but usesnanoTimestamp
directly. Convert to milliseconds once and include both ms and ns if needed for clarity.
183-209
: Use a JSON writer instead of manual assembly.Building JSON by hand is error-prone and hard to maintain. Consider using
std.json
streaming API or a dedicated JSON builder to handle escaping and structural integrity.
516-522
: Duplicate immediate skip logic in opcode analysis.Same push-size skipping appears in multiple functions (
disassemble
,analyze_opcodes
,find_jump_destinations
,analyze_gas_usage
,analyze_security
). Abstract this into a helper to avoid drift and ensure consistency.
1032-1247
: Argument parsing is verbose and fragile.Manual loop with
if-else
for CLI flags is hard to extend. Consider integrating a CLI parser library (e.g., zig-clap) to simplify option handling, validation, and help generation.src/evm/prompts/implement-eip7702-delegation.md (3)
20-21
: Nitpick: missing comma for readability.In “Implement EIP-7702 which allows Externally Owned Accounts…”, add a comma after “EIP-7702”:
- Implement EIP-7702 which allows Externally Owned Accounts… + Implement EIP-7702, which allows Externally Owned Accounts…🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...y for review ## Context Implement EIP-7702 which allows Externally Owned Accounts ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
538-646
: Handle authorization failures explicitly.
execute_set_code_transaction
logs failures but still callsexecute_transaction_base
. You should decide whether invalid authorizations should abort the transaction or proceed. If aborting, return an error early; otherwise document the partial-success semantics.
649-700
: DRY up code-resolution methods.
State.get_effective_code
andState.get_effective_code_address
duplicate the samedecode
logic. Consider refactoring into a shared helper to avoid divergence.src/evm/prompts/implement-call-gas-stipend.md (2)
41-81
: Replace magic literals with constants.
calculate_call_gas
inlines values (2600
,100
,9000
,2300
) rather than using yourgas_constants
. Refactor to:base_cost = if (is_cold_account) gas_constants.CALL_COLD_ACCOUNT_COST else gas_constants.CALL_BASE_COST; if (transfers_value) base_cost += gas_constants.CALL_VALUE_TRANSFER_COST; … const final_gas = gas_to_forward + (transfers_value ? gas_constants.GAS_STIPEND_VALUE_TRANSFER : 0);This ensures consistency and eases future tuning.
333-454
: Avoid direct field access on stipend tracker.You manipulate
frame.stipend_tracker.regular_gas_remaining
directly when refunding unused gas. Expose arefund_unused(u64)
oradd_remaining(u64)
method instead to encapsulate internal state.src/evm/prompts/implement-dynamic-gas-edge-cases.md (1)
249-336
: Use named constants instead of magic numbers.Thresholds like
1024*1024*1024
and32*1024*1024
should referenceMAX_MEMORY_SIZE
andMAX_COPY_SIZE
to avoid drift and improve maintainability.src/evm/prompts/implement-complete-call-operations.md (1)
309-337
: Consider aligning memory expansion with the unified frame API.
op_returndatacopy
currently invokesinterpreter.consume_gas
manually; consider routing through the frame’s stipend-aware methods to maintain consistency across gas metering.src/evm/prompts/implement-account-status-tracking.md (5)
1-10
: Validate workflow instructions against project conventions.
The branch and commit naming guidelines here (snake_case branch without emoji, but using an emoji in the commit message) may conflict with the project's existing conventions. Confirm that emojis in commit messages are allowed and clarify the expected patterns.
6-17
: Unify instruction formatting.
The numbered lists for branch setup and workflow steps mix numeric prefixes and Markdown headings. Consider using consistent bullet or numbered list syntax throughout to improve readability.
462-470
: Optimize history pruning.
UsingorderedRemove(0)
on anArrayList
is O(n) and may degrade performance under high throughput. Consider using a ring buffer or deque structure to maintain a fixed-size history more efficiently.
1140-1185
: Provide test scaffolding.
The testing requirements enumerate test cases but lack concrete Zig test functions and assertions. Include at least one example test implementation per category to guide contributors and ensure consistency withzig test
conventions.
1213-1219
: Clarify concurrency model.
The specs demand thread safety but no synchronization strategy is defined forAccountStatusManager
’s mutable data structures. Please document whether access is single-threaded under Zig’s event loop or if you intend mutexes/atomics for multi-thread safety.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
go-ethereum
(1 hunks)src/evm/README.md
(2 hunks)src/evm/frame.zig
(3 hunks)src/evm/prompts/complete-call-operations.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/fix-wasm-build-integration.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-account-status-tracking.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-async-database-support.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-blake2f-precompile.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-bls12-381-g1add-precompile.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-bundle-state-management.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-cache-optimization.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-call-gas-stipend.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-cli-tools.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-complete-call-operations.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-complete-eip4844-support.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-comprehensive-tracing.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-consensus-test-suite.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-database-interface-traits.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-database-interface.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-dos-protection.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-dynamic-gas-edge-cases.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-ecadd-precompile.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-ecmul-precompile.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-ecpairing-precompile.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-ecrecover-precompile.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-edge-case-handling.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-eip7702-delegation.md
(1 hunks)src/evm/prompts/implement-eof-support.md
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
src/evm/prompts/implement-comprehensive-tracing.md
52-52: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
53-53: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
54-54: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
55-55: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
56-56: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
57-57: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
58-58: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
63-63: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
64-64: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
65-65: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
66-66: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
67-67: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
68-68: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
69-69: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
70-70: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
102-102: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
103-103: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
104-104: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
105-105: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
106-106: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
107-107: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
src/evm/prompts/implement-dos-protection.md
100-100: Code block style
Expected: fenced; Actual: indented
(MD046, code-block-style)
164-164: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🪛 LanguageTool
src/evm/README.md
[typographical] ~170-~170: If specifying a range, consider using an en dash instead of a hyphen.
Context: ...[x] PUSH1-PUSH32 (0x60-0x7F) - Push 1-32 bytes onto stack - [x] DUP1-DUP16 (...
(HYPHEN_TO_EN)
[uncategorized] ~293-~293: When ‘Stack-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ain Support** - [ ] Optimism - OP Stack specific opcodes and behavior - [ ] **Arbitrum...
(SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
[uncategorized] ~295-~295: When ‘Polygon-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...des and gas model - [ ] Polygon - Polygon specific features - [ ] 🟡 EOF Support - EVM...
(SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
[misspelling] ~315-~315: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...Configurable execution handlers for pre/post processing #### Production Hardening - [ ] 🟢 **R...
(EN_COMPOUNDS_POST_PROCESSING)
src/evm/prompts/implement-ecadd-precompile.md
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...entation Search for bn
and ecadd
in revm codebase for elliptic curve implementat...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[grammar] ~288-~288: It seems that “to” is missing before the verb.
Context: ...nsure timing attacks are not possible - Use constant-time field arithmetic - Avoid ...
(MISSING_TO_BETWEEN_BE_AND_VB)
src/evm/prompts/implement-dos-protection.md
[uncategorized] ~162-~162: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...Error.GasLimitExceeded; } } }; #### 2. Memory Protection
zig ...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
src/evm/prompts/implement-consensus-test-suite.md
[grammar] ~20-~20: The verb ‘reporting’ is used with the gerund form.
Context: ...utomated test discovery, execution, and reporting to catch any regressions or compatibility issues...
(ADMIT_ENJOY_VB)
[style] ~784-~784: This phrase is redundant (‘I’ stands for ‘Interface’). Use simply “CLIInterface”.
Context: ... b; } }; ### Task 3: Implement CLI Interface File: `/src/evm/consensus/cli.zig`
z...
(ACRONYM_TAUTOLOGY)
[style] ~1053-~1053: This phrase is redundant (‘I’ stands for ‘interface’). Use simply “CLI”.
Context: ...llel processing 4. Usability: Clear CLI interface with helpful error reporting 5. **Autom...
(ACRONYM_TAUTOLOGY)
src/evm/prompts/implement-ecpairing-precompile.md
[grammar] ~26-~26: It seems that an article is missing. Did you mean “a number of”?
Context: ...Cost**: 45,000 + 34,000 × k (where k is number of pairs, Istanbul hardfork) - *Function...
(BUNCH_OF)
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...ion Search for pairing
and bn254
in revm codebase for implementation patterns. ...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[duplication] ~55-~55: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ... Parsing**: Parse G1 and G2 points from input 3. Input Validation: Verify points are valid a...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[uncategorized] ~450-~450: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...eip-197) - Optimal Ate Pairing over BN Curves ...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)
src/evm/prompts/implement-ecmul-precompile.md
[duplication] ~32-~32: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...te coordinates: x, y) ### Mathematical Operation - Operation: P × s = Q (where P is input point, s...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[typographical] ~305-~305: If specifying a range, consider using an en dash instead of a hyphen.
Context: ...ion - Optimize for common scalar sizes (160-256 bits) - Balance between code size and e...
(HYPHEN_TO_EN)
src/evm/prompts/implement-eip7702-delegation.md
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...y for review ## Context Implement EIP-7702 which allows Externally Owned Accounts ...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[style] ~852-~852: Using “real” as an adverb is considered informal. Consider using “really” or “very”.
Context: ... 6. Integration testing - Test with real smart contracts ## References - [EIP-...
(REAL_REALLY)
src/evm/prompts/implement-call-gas-stipend.md
[duplication] ~87-~87: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...: Correctly compute gas forwarding with stipend 3. Stipend Tracking: Track stipend usage separat...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
src/evm/prompts/implement-cli-tools.md
[style] ~1029-~1029: This phrase is redundant (‘I’ stands for ‘Interface’). Use simply “CLIInterface”.
Context: ...ation Tasks ### Task 1: Implement Main CLI Interface File: /src/evm/cli/main.zig
```zig co...
(ACRONYM_TAUTOLOGY)
src/evm/prompts/implement-complete-call-operations.md
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...otection**: Calls fail if depth exceeds limit ## Reference Implementations ### evmo...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (25)
src/evm/prompts/implement-cache-optimization.md (1)
1-1922
: File seems unrelated to PR objectives
Theimplement-cache-optimization.md
prompt details a full cache-optimization framework, whereas the PR summary targets test coverage enhancements for stack, block, and environment operations. Please verify if this file should be part of this PR.go-ethereum (1)
1-1
:❌ Incorrect review comment
Submodule pointer update
This updates thego-ethereum
submodule to commit35dd84ce2999ecf5ca8ace50a4d1a6abc231c370
. Please verify that this commit includes all intended EVM and precompile enhancements and that no unintended changes are pulled in.Run:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Confirm the submodule is at the expected commit git submodule status go-ethereumLength of output: 106
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify .gitmodules and go-ethereum directory state echo "=== .gitmodules check ===" if [ -f .gitmodules ]; then echo ".gitmodules file found:" cat .gitmodules else echo ".gitmodules file not found" fi echo echo "=== Search for go-ethereum in .gitmodules ===" grep -R "go-ethereum" .gitmodules 2>/dev/null || echo "No go-ethereum entry in .gitmodules" echo echo "=== go-ethereum folder info ===" ls -ld go-ethereum 2>/dev/null || echo "go-ethereum directory not found"Length of output: 829
Ignore submodule pointer update comment for go-ethereum
Thego-ethereum
folder isn’t registered as a Git submodule (no entry in.gitmodules
), so there’s no submodule pointer to update or verify. Please proceed without treatinggo-ethereum
as a submodule.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
src/evm/frame.zig (1)
115-122
: Double-checkstack
zero-initialisation
Stack
is initialised with.{};
which works only if the type has a valid zero value.
IfStack
requires an explicitinit(...)
, this will cause UB at runtime. Verify the implementation or replace with a dedicated constructor.src/evm/README.md (3)
87-95
: Well-structured Implementation Status section.
The new entries clearly enumerate core EVM architecture components.
247-256
: Critical system features appropriately scoped and referenced.
The missing features list is comprehensive and links to the relevant prompt documents.
452-454
: Roadmap aligned with Implementation Status.
The updated roadmap items correctly reflect the outstanding CALL operations and database interface work.src/evm/prompts/implement-dos-protection.md (1)
1-943
: Extensive and clear DoS protection specification.
The design comprehensively addresses all attack vectors with detailed examples, integration points, and workflow instructions. No immediate issues identified.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~162-~162: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...Error.GasLimitExceeded; } } };#### 2. Memory Protection
zig ...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
100-100: Code block style
Expected: fenced; Actual: indented(MD046, code-block-style)
164-164: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null(MD040, fenced-code-language)
src/evm/prompts/implement-async-database-support.md (1)
28-59
: Pointer type validation may be too strict
Theinit
function uses@typeInfo
checks to assert exactly one-pointer depth. This could reject valid interface implementations (e.g., slices or multi-level pointers). Confirm this model meets all intended use cases or consider relaxing to only check for.Pointer
and drop the size check.src/evm/prompts/implement-ecrecover-precompile.md (1)
320-321
: Confirm precompile address registration
EnsureECRECOVER_ADDRESS: u8 = 0x01
is registered inprecompiles.zig
so the dispatcher invokes this implementation.src/evm/prompts/implement-bundle-state-management.md (1)
157-176
: Clarify error path for too many bundles.When
max_active_bundles
is reached andauto_garbage_collection
is false, the code returnsBundleError.TooManyActiveBundles
. Ensure callers handle this error gracefully; consider logging or providing a recovery strategy.src/evm/prompts/implement-eip7702-delegation.md (2)
217-277
: LGTM!
DelegationManager
API is clean and aligns with SOLID principles, providing clear methods for delegation CRUD and code resolution.
753-779
: LGTM!Updates to
execute_call
to use delegation-aware code address and code retrieval look correct and align with the spec.src/evm/prompts/implement-call-gas-stipend.md (5)
94-138
: LGTM!
GAS_STIPEND_VALUE_TRANSFER
,CallGasCalculation
, andStipendTracker
are well-defined and cover stipend tracking accurately.
145-156
: Skip: external config only.These constant additions in
gas_constants.zig
match the spec and integrate correctly.
161-240
: LGTM!
call_gas_calculator.calculate_call_gas
correctly handles cold/warm, value transfer, new account cost, 63/64th forwarding, and stipend.
292-326
: LGTM!Frame methods wrap stipend tracker cleanly, enabling seamless gas consumption.
460-475
: LGTM!Updating opcodes to use
frame.consume_gas
is a clean modularization of stipend-aware metering.src/evm/prompts/implement-dynamic-gas-edge-cases.md (3)
84-92
: Skip: enum definition is straightforward.
93-117
: LGTM!EdgeCaseHandler’s overflow and bounds checks align with the spec, and result handling is clear.
124-180
: LGTM!Safe memory and call gas calculators properly guard against overflow and invalid inputs.
src/evm/prompts/implement-complete-call-operations.md (4)
69-82
: LGTM!
CallInput
struct neatly encapsulates call parameters and supports delegate/static variants.
125-152
: LGTM!
CallContext
cleanly manages return data and context fields, adhering to RAII.
276-303
: LGTM!
ReturnData
struct offers a robust buffer API for return data management.
380-398
: LGTM!
CallStack
pooling and depth checks provide a performant foundation for call management.src/evm/prompts/implement-account-status-tracking.md (1)
598-607
: Ensure history query semantics.
For bothget_latest_balance
andget_balance_at_block
, clarify whether ordering should be chronological and handle empty-change cases consistently. Add tests to validate boundary conditions (e.g., no changes, changes exactly at the block).Also applies to: 613-622
fn run_tests_parallel( | ||
self: *TestRunner, | ||
test_files: []const []const u8, | ||
summary: *TestSummary | ||
) !void { | ||
// Simplified parallel execution - in real implementation would use thread pool | ||
for (test_files) |file_path| { | ||
const result = self.run_test_file(file_path) catch |err| { | ||
std.log.err("Failed to run test file '{}': {}", .{ file_path, err }); | ||
summary.failed += 1; | ||
continue; | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Parallel runner is not parallel
The run_tests_parallel
loop is purely sequential. Replace it with a thread pool or std.Thread
usage to achieve real concurrency per the spec.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/evm/prompts/implement-consensus-test-suite.md around lines 332 to 343,
the run_tests_parallel function currently executes test files sequentially in a
loop, which does not provide real parallelism. To fix this, refactor the
function to use a thread pool or spawn multiple std.Thread instances to run each
test file concurrently. Ensure proper synchronization when updating the summary
to avoid race conditions.
return StateTest{ | ||
.name = try self.allocator.dupe(u8, "test"), | ||
.test_data = undefined, // Would be populated from JSON | ||
}; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Parsing functions are stubs using undefined
parse_state_test
, parse_blockchain_test
, and parse_transaction_test
return placeholder structures with undefined
data. You must implement JSON→struct mapping or return a meaningful error instead of undefined
.
Also applies to: 930-938, 941-949
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/evm/prompts/implement-consensus-test-suite.md around lines 924 to 928,
the parsing functions return structs with fields set to undefined, which are
placeholders. Replace these undefined fields by implementing proper
JSON-to-struct mapping to populate the data from the JSON input, or
alternatively, modify the functions to return a meaningful error indicating
unimplemented parsing instead of using undefined values. Apply similar fixes to
the functions in lines 930-938 and 941-949.
// Placeholder implementation | ||
return true; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Placeholder always returns true
execute_state_test
is currently a stub (return true
). This bypasses all validation. Implement actual parsing/execution logic or signal an error until it's complete.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/evm/prompts/implement-consensus-test-suite.md around lines 431 to 433,
the function execute_state_test currently returns true unconditionally,
bypassing all validation. Replace this placeholder by implementing the actual
parsing and execution logic for the state test, or alternatively modify the
function to throw an error or return a failure status to indicate that the
implementation is incomplete.
const std = @import("std"); | ||
const Vm = @import("../vm.zig").Vm; | ||
const Address = @import("../Address.zig").Address; | ||
const U256 = @import("../Types/U256.ts").U256; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Critical: Incorrect import extension for U256
The snippet uses @import("../Types/U256.ts")
—Zig files should end in .zig
, not .ts
. This will fail compilation.
- const U256 = @import("../Types/U256.ts").U256;
+ const U256 = @import("../Types/U256.zig").U256;
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const U256 = @import("../Types/U256.ts").U256; | |
const U256 = @import("../Types/U256.zig").U256; |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/evm/prompts/implement-consensus-test-suite.md at line 180, the import
statement for U256 incorrectly uses the extension .ts instead of .zig. Change
the import path to use the correct .zig extension by replacing
"../Types/U256.ts" with "../Types/U256.zig" to ensure successful compilation.
chain_id: u64, | ||
nonce: u64, | ||
max_priority_fee_per_gas: u256, | ||
max_fee_per_gas: u256, | ||
gas_limit: u64, | ||
to: ?Address, | ||
value: u256, | ||
data: []const u8, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Type mismatch: use U256
instead of u256
In the BlobTransaction
spec, fields are declared as u256
but elsewhere you import U256
. This inconsistency will break type resolution.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/evm/prompts/implement-complete-eip4844-support.md around lines 29 to 36,
the type `u256` is used for several fields but should be replaced with `U256` to
match the imported type and ensure consistent type resolution. Update all
occurrences of `u256` to `U256` in the field declarations.
// Check for EOA -> Contract transition | ||
if (old_account.code_hash.equals(EMPTY_CODE_HASH) and !new_account.code_hash.equals(EMPTY_CODE_HASH)) { | ||
status.account_type = .Contract; | ||
|
||
const event = LifecycleEvent{ | ||
.event_type = .AccountTypeChanged, | ||
.timestamp = std.time.milliTimestamp(), | ||
.block_number = 0, // Would be filled in by caller | ||
.transaction_hash = null, | ||
.details = .{ .type_change = TypeChangeDetails{ | ||
.old_type = .EOA, | ||
.new_type = .Contract, | ||
}}, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
try status.lifecycle_events.append(event); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Populate event metadata correctly.
In check_status_transitions
, the LifecycleEvent
for type change uses block_number = 0
and transaction_hash = null
. This placeholder prevents accurate historical tracing. Replace with the caller-provided block_number
and transaction_hash
from context.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/evm/prompts/implement-account-status-tracking.md around lines 418 to 434,
the LifecycleEvent for account type changes uses placeholder values for
block_number and transaction_hash, which prevents accurate event tracking.
Update the event initialization to use the actual block_number and
transaction_hash values passed from the caller context instead of 0 and null,
ensuring the event metadata reflects the correct transaction details.
accounts_created: u64, | ||
eoa_accounts_created: u64, | ||
contract_accounts_created: u64, | ||
accounts_deleted: u64, | ||
accounts_modified: u64, | ||
total_balance_changes: u64, | ||
total_nonce_changes: u64, | ||
total_code_deployments: u64, | ||
total_storage_operations: u64, | ||
peak_active_accounts: u64, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extend statistics on modifications.
LifecycleStatistics
tracks created and deleted accounts but doesn’t account for modifications. Consider adding and invoking a record_account_modification
method when tracking modifications to maintain accurate lifecycle metrics.
Also applies to: 871-879
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/evm/prompts/implement-account-status-tracking.md around lines 855 to 864
and 871 to 879, the LifecycleStatistics struct tracks created and deleted
accounts but lacks tracking for account modifications. Add a
record_account_modification method to LifecycleStatistics that increments the
accounts_modified counter, and ensure this method is called whenever an account
modification occurs to keep lifecycle metrics accurate.
pub const AccountStatusManager = struct { | ||
allocator: std.mem.Allocator, | ||
config: TrackingConfig, | ||
account_registry: std.HashMap(Address, AccountStatus, AddressContext, std.hash_map.default_max_load_percentage), | ||
status_history: std.ArrayList(AccountStatusChange), | ||
lifecycle_statistics: LifecycleStatistics, | ||
status_listeners: std.ArrayList(StatusListener), | ||
cleanup_scheduler: CleanupScheduler, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Define missing helper methods in the manager.
The spec references get_top_active_accounts
, generate_performance_summary
, and get_status_distribution
in generate_status_report
, but these methods are not specified above. Please include their signatures and behavioral contracts to complete the API.
Also applies to: 320-329
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/evm/prompts/implement-account-status-tracking.md around lines 28 to 35
and also lines 320 to 329, the AccountStatusManager struct is missing the helper
method definitions for get_top_active_accounts, generate_performance_summary,
and get_status_distribution, which are referenced in generate_status_report. Add
these method signatures to the struct with clear behavioral contracts describing
their inputs, outputs, and purpose to complete the API and ensure the spec
matches the implementation.
pub fn get_balance_at_block(self: *const BalanceHistory, block_number: u64) ?U256 { | ||
for (self.changes.items) |change| { | ||
if (change.block_number <= block_number) { | ||
continue; | ||
} | ||
return change.old_balance; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return self.get_latest_balance(); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix get_balance_at_block
logic.
The current implementation skips all changes with change.block_number <= block_number
and returns change.old_balance
on the first greater block, which doesn’t yield the correct balance at the given block. You likely want to track the last change before or at the target block and return its new_balance
.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/evm/prompts/implement-account-status-tracking.md around lines 598 to 607,
the get_balance_at_block function incorrectly skips all changes with
block_number less than or equal
10000
to the target and returns the old_balance of the
first change with a greater block_number. To fix this, iterate through changes
to find the last change with block_number less than or equal to the target
block_number and return its new_balance. If no such change exists, return the
latest balance as fallback.
const Address = @import("../../Address/Address.ts").Address; | ||
const U256 = @import("../../Types/U256.ts").U256; | ||
const Hash = @import("../../Hash/Keccak256.ts").Hash; | ||
|
||
pub const AccountStatusManager = struct { | ||
// Implementation based on the specification above | ||
// ... (full implementation details) | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct file extension imports.
The snippet for AccountStatusManager
imports from Address.ts
and U256.ts
, but Zig code should use .zig
modules (e.g., Address.zig
). Verify paths and extensions to avoid build errors.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/evm/prompts/implement-account-status-tracking.md around lines 1003 to
1010, the imports use incorrect file extensions (.ts) for Zig modules. Change
the import statements to use the correct .zig extensions for the modules, such
as Address.zig and U256.zig, ensuring the paths remain accurate to avoid build
errors.
Resolved all merge conflicts by accepting both changes where appropriate. Main areas merged: - Updated README.md with latest precompile implementations - Added new prompt files for various implementation features - Included latest build.zig updates - Integrated new test infrastructure 🤖 Generated with Claude Code Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
…rom main ✅ Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ive-test-coverage
…ive-test-coverage
…ive-test-coverage
Summary
Test plan
zig build test-all
)🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit