-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
[#446] Show symbols of external C/C++ files #449
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Hi @ghentschke, with this patch, the endless loop is eliminated when attempting to expand an external translation unit node in the Project Explorer view, but I observe the following exception logged:
Do you also observe this exception? |
No, I haven't seen this exception but I it seems to be a LSP4E problem. |
Hm, it's strange that |
With the latest LSP4E I cannot reproduce this behavior |
Hi @ghentschke, yes this is reproducible. I am using LSP4E from the current CDT target definition: |
I had the wrong target platform |
I could not reproduce the exception with |
@ghentschke I will try with a 2025-03 target platform. Note that we need to update the CDT API baseline to CDT 12.0.0 / CDT-LSP 3.0.0 before committing to the |
@ghentschke, I tried updating my CDT target definition locally to use LSP4E 0.27.1 ( |
@ghentschke, the issue I was seeing was caused by the presence of Your change is now working for me. 👍 We do need to update the API baseline though. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bundle-Version: 3.0.100.qualifier
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comme 8000 nt
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Must the service segment increased with every PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, just once per release cycle: https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform/blob/master/docs/VersionNumbering.md
I now note that @jonahgraham has already merged version updates to main
via #451 so there is no need to modify the version. Apologies for the confusion. Please do revert back to version 3.0.100 for this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jld01 if you have no objections I would like to merge this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested and looks good to me, @ghentschke.
@jld01 Thank you very much! |
fixes #446