content: knowledgebase #160
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideThis pull request introduces a new “content” plugin with a fully integrated knowledgebase feature across backend and frontend: it adds TRPC support for custom fields, extends the erxes-ui library with new GraphQL fragments and an IconPicker, creates a content_api plugin (Mongoose schemas/models, GraphQL & TRPC resolvers, ApolloServer integration, portal utilities) and a content_ui plugin (NX app scaffold, module federation, React components, routing and GraphQL queries/mutations), and adjusts development scripts to skip NX cache. Sequence Diagram: Prepare Custom Fields Data InteractionsequenceDiagram
participant CA as content_api Plugin
participant CO as core-api
CA->>CO: TRPC Call: fields.prepareCustomFieldsData(input)
CO->>CO: models.Fields.prepareCustomFieldsData(input)
CO-->>CA: Prepared Custom Fields Data
Sequence Diagram: Knowledge Base Article Creation/UpdatesequenceDiagram
actor User
participant CUI as content_ui (ArticleDrawer)
participant CAPI as content_api (GraphQL Resolvers)
participant Models as content_api (Mongoose Models)
participant DB as MongoDB
User->>CUI: Fills article form and clicks Save
CUI->>CAPI: GraphQL Mutation (ADD_ARTICLE / EDIT_ARTICLE with article data)
CAPI->>Models: KnowledgeBaseArticles.createDoc(data) / .updateDoc(id, data)
Models->>DB: Save/Update article document
DB-->>Models: Saved/Updated Document
Models-->>CAPI: Article Document
CAPI-->>CUI: Article Data (success/error)
CUI->>User: Shows success/error message
Entity Relationship Diagram: Content API Knowledge Base EntitieserDiagram
KnowledgeBaseTopic {
string _id PK
string code
string title
string description
string brandId
}
KnowledgeBaseCategory {
string _id PK
string code
string title
string description
string icon
string topicId FK
string parentCategoryId FK "nullable"
}
KnowledgeBaseArticle {
string _id PK
string code
string title
string summary
string content
string status
string categoryId FK
string topicId FK
}
KnowledgeBaseTopic ||--o{ KnowledgeBaseCategory : "has"
KnowledgeBaseCategory ||--o{ KnowledgeBaseArticle : "contains"
KnowledgeBaseCategory }o--o| KnowledgeBaseCategory : "is_child_of (parent)"
KnowledgeBaseTopic ||--o{ KnowledgeBaseArticle : "groups (indirectly)"
Entity Relationship Diagram: Content API Portal EntitieserDiagram
Portal {
string _id PK
string name
string url
string kind
string knowledgeBaseTopicId FK "nullable"
string ticketStageId FK "nullable"
string dealStageId FK "nullable"
string taskStageId FK "nullable"
string slug
}
PortalUser {
string _id PK
string portalId FK
string email
string phone
string username
string erxesCustomerId FK "nullable"
string erxesCompanyId FK "nullable"
string type "customer | company"
}
ErxesCustomer {
string _id PK
string primaryEmail
string primaryPhone
}
ErxesCompany {
string _id PK
string primaryName
string primaryEmail
}
Portal ||--o{ PortalUser : "has_users"
PortalUser }o--|| ErxesCustomer : "linked_to (optional)"
PortalUser }o--|| ErxesCompany : "linked_to (optional)"
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
""" WalkthroughThis change introduces a comprehensive content management system to both backend and frontend codebases. It adds a new backend plugin ( Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Frontend (content_ui)
participant ApolloServer (content_api)
participant Mongoose Models
participant MongoDB
User->>Frontend (content_ui): Navigate to Knowledge Base UI
Frontend (content_ui)->>ApolloServer (content_api): GraphQL Query/Mutation (e.g., fetch topics, add article)
ApolloServer (content_api)->>Mongoose Models: Execute resolver logic
Mongoose Models->>MongoDB: Perform database operation (find, create, update)
MongoDB-->>Mongoose Models: Return data/result
Mongoose Models-->>ApolloServer (content_api): Return entity/result
ApolloServer (content_api)-->>Frontend (content_ui): Return GraphQL response
Frontend (content_ui)-->>User: Render updated UI
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed acc2b79 in 1 minute and 27 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
412lines of code in18files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/content-first/Main.tsx:1
- Draft comment:
Removed legacy lazy-loaded routing component. Verify that all route references and navigation links have been updated to use the new Knowledge Base plugin components. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/pages/content-first/IndexPage.tsx:1
- Draft comment:
Removed IndexPage with placeholder content. Ensure that any links or navigation that previously referenced this page now point to the updated pages from the new content plugin. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/pages/content-second/IndexPage.tsx:1
- Draft comment:
Removed placeholder IndexPage; double-check that any routes or settings linking to 'content-second' have been redirected to new implementations. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_NsbBy6y83EOqeYJ6
You can customize 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @soyombo-baterdene - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 6 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
| @@ -541,7 +545,7 @@ export const loadFieldClass = (models: IModels, subdomain: string) => { | |||
| isDefinedByErxes: true, | |||
| }); | |||
| if (fields.length > existingFields.length) { | |||
| let newFields: any[] = []; | |||
| const newFields: any[] = []; | |||
| fields.map((x) => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: Using map for side effects obscures intent
Use forEach or a for…of loop here to clarify that you're not creating a new array, just pushing to newFields.
| console.time('Migration time'); | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| await mongoose.connect(MONGO_URL); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (bug_risk): Migration script never disconnects from MongoDB
Call await mongoose.disconnect() after the updates to ensure the connection closes properly, especially if process.exit() is removed.
Suggested implementation:
const migrate = async () => {
console.time('Migration time');
try { try {
// ... your migration logic here ...
} finally {
await mongoose.disconnect();
console.log('Disconnected from MongoDB');
}
const MONGO_URL =
process.argv[2] || 'mongodb://localhost:27017/erxes?directConnection=true';
if (!MONGO_URL) {
throw new Error('MONGO_URL not provided');
}
const schema = new mongoose.Schema({}, { strict: false });
const User = mongoose.model('client_portal_users', schema);
const Companies = mongoose.model('client_portal_companies', schema);| Edit Article | ||
| </DropdownMenu.Item> | ||
| <DropdownMenu.Separator /> | ||
| <DropdownMenu.Item className="text-red-600"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (bug_risk): Add delete handler to menu item
Currently, the Delete Article item is not functional. Please connect it to the appropriate mutation (e.g., removeArticle) and ensure the article list is updated after deletion.
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Users.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| const updatedUsers = await models.Users.updateMany( | ||
| { _id: { $in: userIdsToUpdate } }, | ||
| { $set: { portalId: newportalId, modifiedAt: new Date() } }, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| return updatedUsers; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Inline variable that is immediately returned (inline-immediately-returned-variable)
| const updatedUsers = await models.Users.updateMany( | |
| { _id: { $in: userIdsToUpdate } }, | |
| { $set: { portalId: newportalId, modifiedAt: new Date() } }, | |
| ); | |
| return updatedUsers; | |
| return await models.Users.updateMany( | |
| { _id: { $in: userIdsToUpdate } }, | |
| { $set: { portalId: newportalId, modifiedAt: new Date() } }, | |
| ); | |
Explanation
Something that we often see in people's code is assigning to a result variableand then immediately returning it.
Returning the result directly shortens the code and removes an unnecessary
variable, reducing the mental load of reading the function.
Where intermediate variables can be useful is if they then get used as a
parameter or a condition, and the name can act like a comment on what the
variable represents. In the case where you're returning it from a function, the
function name is there to tell you what the result is, so the variable name
is unnecessary.
| const { models, portalId, document, password = random('Aa0!', 8) } = args; | ||
| const { type = 'customer' } = document; | ||
| const trimmedMail = (document.email || '').toLowerCase().trim(); | ||
| const phone = document.phone; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Prefer object destructuring when accessing and using properties. (use-object-destructuring)
| const phone = document.phone; | |
| const {phone} = document; |
Explanation
Object destructuring can often remove an unnecessary temporary reference, as well as making your code more succinct.From the Airbnb Javascript Style Guide
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed everything up to 876753b in 5 minutes and 43 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
9182lines of code in123files - Skipped
6files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
30draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts:4
- Draft comment:
Typo: 'sampe' field in the User extension likely should be 'sample' (or a proper name). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/definitions/notification.ts:9
- Draft comment:
Non-standard use of 'optional: true' in schema definitions. Consider using 'required: false' or proper validation options. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While 'required: false' is more common in Mongoose schemas, 'optional: true' is also valid and achieves the same result. The comment is technically correct but the change is stylistic rather than functional. Multiple fields use 'optional: true' consistently in this schema (eventData, groupId). Changing just one instance would make the code less consistent. The comment points out a real style inconsistency with common Mongoose patterns. Maybe consistency with broader Mongoose community practices is more important than internal consistency? Internal code consistency is more important here since the codebase has established a pattern of using 'optional: true'. Making one field different would be more confusing. Delete this comment. While technically correct, changing this would reduce internal consistency and the current code is functionally correct.
3. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/definitions/page.ts:17
- Draft comment:
Usage of 'optional: true' in customFieldsData field—verify if this aligns with your schema validation method. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50% 1. In Mongoose schemas, 'required: true/false' is the standard way to mark fields as mandatory/optional. 2. 'optional: true' is not a standard Mongoose schema option. 3. This could cause validation issues since Mongoose might ignore this non-standard property. 4. The comment points out a real potential issue with the schema definition. The code might be using a custom validation layer where 'optional' is a valid property that gets handled elsewhere. Even if there's a custom validation layer, mixing standard Mongoose properties ('required') with non-standard ones ('optional') is confusing and potentially problematic. Keep the comment as it points out a real issue with schema validation that should be addressed - the use of a non-standard property that could cause validation problems.
4. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/definitions/portal.ts:58
- Draft comment:
Custom schema options 'optional: true' used repeatedly; ensure these options are supported by your Mongoose setup. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that the custom schema options are supported by their Mongoose setup. This falls under the rule of not asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or tested. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue with the code.
5. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Users.ts:435
- Draft comment:
Password policy error message: consider rewording to improve clarity (e.g. 'Password must contain a number, uppercase and lowercase letter, and be at least 8 characters long'). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
6. frontend/libs/erxes-ui/src/components/icon-picker.tsx:21
- Draft comment:
Tip: consider memoizing filtered icons to avoid re-computation on every render. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:40%<= threshold50%None
7. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/db/definitions/knowledgebase.ts:58
- Draft comment:
Typographical Note: The label for the "viewCount" field reads "Count how many times visitor viewed". This phrasing might be clearer as "Count how many times a visitor viewed" or similar; please verify the intended wording. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is about a minor grammatical improvement to a label string. While technically correct, this kind of minor wording change doesn't affect functionality and isn't a critical code quality issue. The current wording, while not perfect, is still understandable. This seems like the kind of nitpicky comment that adds noise without significant value. The grammar could be considered incorrect and might cause confusion for non-native English speakers. Labels are part of the UI/UX experience. While grammar is important, this is a minor issue that doesn't affect functionality or code quality. The rules specifically state not to make purely informative comments or obvious/unimportant changes. Delete this comment as it's a minor grammatical suggestion that doesn't materially improve the code quality or functionality.
8. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/db/definitions/knowledgebase.ts:116
- Draft comment:
Typographical Note: The field "languageCode" uses the label "Language codes" (plural). Since the field name is singular, consider changing the label to "Language code" for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the inconsistency exists, labels are primarily used for UI display purposes. The suggestion is technically correct but very minor. The code would work perfectly fine either way. This seems like a purely cosmetic issue that doesn't affect functionality or code quality in any meaningful way. The inconsistency could potentially cause confusion in the UI, and maintaining consistent naming conventions is generally good practice. However, this is an extremely minor UI labeling issue that doesn't affect functionality, and the rules specifically state not to comment on pure UI issues or make unimportant comments. This comment should be removed as it addresses a minor UI labeling issue that doesn't impact functionality or code quality significantly.
9. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/db/models/Knowledgebase.ts:247
- Draft comment:
Typo: In the comment for removeDoc, 'it's children articles' should be 'its children articles'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% While technically correct, this is an extremely minor documentation issue that doesn't affect code functionality. The meaning is perfectly clear either way. Comments about pure documentation/grammar issues that don't affect code understanding should generally be avoided as they add noise without much value. The comment is technically correct - it is pointing out a real grammatical error. Documentation quality does matter for maintainability. While technically correct, this level of nitpicking on grammar in comments violates the principle of only making important, actionable comments that clearly require code changes. The meaning is clear regardless. This comment should be removed as it's too minor and doesn't affect code functionality or understanding.
10. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/db/models/Knowledgebase.ts:335
- Draft comment:
Typo: In the comment for removeDoc, 'it's children categories' should be 'its children categories'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While this is technically correct (it's = it is, its = possessive), comments about minor typos and grammar in documentation are generally not important enough to warrant a PR comment. The meaning is still clear despite the grammatical error. This kind of minor documentation fix could be made directly or saved for a documentation cleanup pass. The grammar error could potentially confuse non-native English speakers. Documentation quality is important for maintainability. While documentation quality matters, this particular error is extremely minor and doesn't impact understanding. The development process shouldn't be slowed down for such trivial fixes. Delete this comment as it addresses a minor grammatical issue that doesn't impact code quality or functionality.
11. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts:218
- Draft comment:
Typo: The error message reads "Scheduled Date can not be in the past !". Consider using "cannot" as one word and removing the extra space before the exclamation mark (e.g., "Scheduled Date cannot be in the past!"). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While this is technically correct and would improve the code quality slightly, it's a very minor change to error message text. The current message is still perfectly understandable. The rules say not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant. This feels like a nitpick that doesn't materially impact the code's functionality. The error message appears in user-facing text, so consistent and professional wording could be important for UX. The change is also very easy to make. While the change is easy, the rules specifically say not to make purely informative comments or comments about obvious/unimportant things. This is a cosmetic change to error text that doesn't affect functionality. Delete the comment. While technically correct, it's too minor of an issue to warrant a PR comment according to our rules.
12. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/mutations.ts:301
- Draft comment:
Typo: The same error message appears here. Consider revising it to "Scheduled Date cannot be in the past!" for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While the suggestion would make the code slightly more consistent and professional looking, this is a very minor style issue that doesn't affect functionality. The error message is still clear and understandable either way. Making comments about minor text tweaks like this creates noise in the PR review. The comment does point out an actual inconsistency in the codebase. Having consistent error messages is generally good practice. However, the benefit is extremely minor and this kind of nitpicking about message punctuation/spacing distracts from more important code review feedback. The current message works fine. This comment should be removed as it focuses on an extremely minor style issue that doesn't meaningfully impact the code quality or user experience.
13. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts:112
- Draft comment:
Typo: 'anc' in the comment should be 'and'. Please update the comment to 'Article detail and increase a view count'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the typo exists, JSDoc comments are purely informative and don't affect functionality. The meaning is still clear despite the typo. According to the rules, we should not make purely informative comments or comments about obvious/unimportant issues. A typo in documentation falls into this category. The typo could theoretically make the code slightly less professional looking or harder to maintain. Documentation quality does matter. While documentation quality matters, this particular typo is minor and obvious enough that it doesn't warrant a formal PR comment. The developer can fix it if they notice it, but it's not worth calling out. Delete the comment as it's too minor and purely informative, not suggesting any meaningful code changes.
14. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts:28
- Draft comment:
Typo: In the fieldpublishedUserId:String, consider adding a space after the colon for consistency with other fields (e.g.publishedUserId: String). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While this is a real inconsistency, it's a very minor style issue. The GraphQL schema will work exactly the same either way. The comment is technically correct, but may not meet the bar of "clearly requiring a code change". Style consistency is good, but this is an extremely minor issue. The inconsistent spacing could make the code slightly harder to read and maintain. Consistent formatting helps readability. While consistency is good, this is such a minor issue that it doesn't warrant a comment. Many teams would use an auto-formatter to handle such details rather than reviewing them manually. This comment should be removed as it addresses an extremely minor style issue that doesn't meaningfully impact code quality or functionality.
15. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts:29
- Draft comment:
Typo: In the fieldpublishedUser:User, consider adding a space after the colon for consistency (should bepublishedUser: User). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While consistent formatting is good, this is a very minor stylistic issue. It doesn't affect functionality at all. The comment is about something that was changed (this is a new file), but it's an extremely trivial formatting issue. Most teams would use automated formatters for this kind of thing rather than manual review comments. The inconsistent spacing could make the schema harder to read and maintain. Having a consistent style throughout the codebase is valuable. While consistency is good, this is too minor to warrant a PR comment. This kind of formatting should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review. Delete this comment as it's too minor and stylistic. This kind of formatting consistency should be enforced by automated tools rather than PR comments.
16. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts:171
- Draft comment:
Typo: In the query arguments, the parameters are missing a comma. It readsids:[String] topicIds: [String]which should likely beids: [String], topicIds: [String]. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct about inconsistent comma usage, GraphQL is actually quite flexible with its syntax and will parse this correctly either way. The missing comma is just a style issue and doesn't affect functionality. Looking at other queries in the file, there's no consistent style being followed for comma usage between parameters. The comment identifies a real inconsistency in the code formatting. Consistent formatting can make code more maintainable. However, this is a minor stylistic issue that doesn't affect functionality. If there was a team style guide being violated that would be different, but there's no evidence of a consistent style being followed here. While technically correct, this comment is too minor and doesn't identify a real issue that needs fixing. The code will work fine either way.
17. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/@types/user.ts:2
- Draft comment:
Typo: There is a missing space in the import statement. Consider changingimport { IAttachment} from ...toimport { IAttachment } from .... - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While technically correct, this is an extremely minor formatting issue that would likely be caught and fixed automatically by any code formatter like Prettier. It doesn't affect functionality at all. According to the rules, we shouldn't make comments that are obvious or unimportant. The missing space could be indicative of inconsistent code formatting practices in the codebase. Maybe there's value in maintaining consistent style. Style consistency is important, but this is too minor to warrant a PR comment. This should be handled by automated tooling rather than manual review comments. Delete this comment as it's too minor and would be better handled by automated formatting tools.
18. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/constants.ts:15
- Draft comment:
Typographical suggestion: Consider changing "after you login" to "after you log in" for correct verb usage. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While technically correct grammar, this is a very minor change that doesn't affect functionality. The meaning is perfectly clear either way. This seems like the kind of nitpicky comment that creates noise without adding much value. The rules say not to make purely informative comments or unimportant suggestions. Grammar in user-facing text could be considered important since it affects professionalism. Poor grammar might reflect badly on the company. While proper grammar is good, this particular case is an extremely common informal usage that most users wouldn't notice or care about. The benefit doesn't justify the overhead of making the change. Delete this comment as it suggests an unimportant change that doesn't meaningfully improve the code or user experience.
19. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/definitions/menu.ts:17
- Draft comment:
Typo: There's an extra space before the comma in the object literal on this line (i.e.type: Number , required: true). Consider removing the extra space for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct about the extra space, this is an extremely minor formatting issue. It doesn't affect functionality at all. Most teams would use automated formatting tools like Prettier to handle such minor spacing issues. Making a PR comment about this creates unnecessary noise. The inconsistent spacing could indicate that automated formatting isn't being used, and establishing consistent formatting early in a new file could be valuable. Even if formatting tools aren't in place, this is too minor to warrant a PR comment. If formatting is a concern, it should be addressed through team-wide tooling rather than individual comments. Delete this comment as it addresses an extremely minor formatting issue that doesn't impact code quality or functionality.
20. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Comment.ts:16
- Draft comment:
Typo: "Retreives comment" should be "Retrieves comment". - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct about the typo, it's an extremely minor documentation issue that doesn't affect functionality. The rules state not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant. A simple typo in a doc comment is quite minor and could be seen as noise in the PR review. The typo could propagate to generated documentation. Poor spelling in comments could be seen as unprofessional. While documentation quality matters, this is an extremely minor issue that doesn't warrant a formal PR comment. The benefit of fixing it doesn't outweigh the overhead of the review comment. Delete this comment as it points out an unimportant typo that doesn't materially affect the code quality.
21. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Users.ts:12
- Draft comment:
Typo: 'IInvitiation' appears to be misspelled. Consider using 'IInvitation' instead. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
22. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Users.ts:13
- Draft comment:
Typo: 'INotifcationSettings' appears to be misspelled. Consider using 'INotificationSettings' instead. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
23. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Users.ts:369
- Draft comment:
Typo: The comment 'Remove remove Business Portal Users' contains a duplicated word. Consider revising it to 'Remove Business Portal Users'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct about the typo, it's a very minor documentation issue. The meaning is still clear despite the duplication. Documentation comments are part of the code, but this is an extremely minor issue that doesn't affect functionality or code quality in any meaningful way. The typo does make the code slightly less professional looking. Documentation quality is part of overall code quality. While documentation quality matters, this is such a minor issue that it doesn't warrant a PR comment. The duplicated word doesn't cause any confusion about the method's purpose. Delete the comment. The typo is too minor to justify a PR comment.
24. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/company.ts:23
- Draft comment:
Typographical error: 'Retreives' should be corrected to 'Retrieves'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct, it's pointing out a very minor spelling error in documentation. The meaning is still clear despite the typo. According to the rules, we should not make comments that are obvious or unimportant. Documentation typos, unless they significantly impact understanding, fall into this category. The typo could be seen as unprofessional and might be worth fixing. Documentation quality is important for maintainability. While documentation quality matters, this particular typo doesn't impact code functionality or documentation clarity. The rules specifically state not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant. This comment should be deleted as it points out a minor, obvious issue that doesn't significantly impact code or documentation quality.
25. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/graphql/resolvers/customResolvers/extenstions.ts:1
- Draft comment:
Typo: The file name seems to be misspelled as 'extenstions.ts'. Consider renaming it to 'extensions.ts'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is correct about the typo, our rules state we should not comment on file renames or anything that would be caught by the build. Typos in filenames often cause build or import issues that would be caught automatically. Additionally, renaming files is a trivial fix that doesn't require a code review comment. The typo could lead to confusion for other developers and make the codebase less maintainable. It's a valid concern about code quality. While maintainability is important, filename issues are typically caught by linters, build systems, or import statements. This isn't a complex code quality issue that requires reviewer attention. The comment should be deleted as it violates our rule about not commenting on file renames or issues that would be caught by the build system.
26. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/utils.ts:52
- Draft comment:
Typo: the error message 'user is already exists' should be corrected to 'user already exists'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
27. frontend/plugins/content_ui/rspack.config.ts:12
- Draft comment:
In the comment, the phrase "provides Typing support Module Federation" seems to be missing a word. Consider revising it to something like "provides typing support for Module Federation" for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the grammar suggestion is technically correct, it's a very minor documentation issue tha 10000 t doesn't affect functionality. The meaning is still clear even with the slightly awkward phrasing. The rules emphasize focusing on code changes and logic issues, not minor documentation tweaks. The comment does point out a legitimate grammatical error, and documentation clarity can be important for maintainability. However, this is an extremely minor documentation issue that doesn't impact code functionality or maintainability in any meaningful way. The meaning is still clear despite the awkward phrasing. Delete the comment as it focuses on a trivial documentation grammar issue rather than substantive code changes or logic problems.
28. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx:211
- Draft comment:
Typo: 'childrens' is non-standard. Consider renaming to 'children' when referencing category children. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
29. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/queries.ts:132
- Draft comment:
Typographical error: In the CATEGORIES query, the field name is written as 'knowledgebaseCategories' (with a lowercase 'b') instead of 'knowledgeBaseCategories' like in the other queries. Please verify if this is intentional or fix the inconsistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The inconsistency is real, but GraphQL field names are defined by the server schema, not the client. The client must match whatever the server expects. Without seeing the server schema, we can't know if this is actually wrong or if it's intentionally different. The comment is speculative without server-side context. The inconsistency could indicate a real bug if the server expects a different field name. The casing difference might cause the query to fail. However, since this is a new file and we don't have access to the server schema, we must assume the author tested these queries and they work. If there was a casing mismatch, the GraphQL query would fail immediately during testing. Delete the comment. Without server schema context, we can't know if this is a real issue, and the query would fail immediately if the field name was wrong.
30. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/pages/content-first/IndexPage.tsx:44
- Draft comment:
There appears to be a typographical error in the h1 text. The string "Samplsdsadasdjakljkljklsade" does not look intentional. Please double-check and update it accordingly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This is a new file being added. The text "Samplsdsadasdjakljkljklsade" is clearly not a real word and looks like keyboard mashing or placeholder text. However, this is a UI text change, and according to the rules we should not comment on pure frontend UI or styling changes - we should assume the author made UI changes correctly. The text is so obviously wrong that it might be worth keeping the comment despite the rule about UI changes. Maybe this is an actual mistake that slipped through. No - the rules are clear that we should not comment on UI changes. The author might be using this text temporarily for testing or might replace it in a future commit. Delete this comment as it violates the rule about not commenting on UI changes. We should trust that the author knows what they're doing with UI text.
Workflow ID: wflow_aESL2vBOPg6X3LTV
You can customize
| type: Boolean, | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| default: false, | ||
| label: 'isPrivate', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typographical Note: The label for the isPrivate field is written as isPrivate (all lowercase). For consistency with other labels (e.g., Created by, Title), consider capitalizing it as Is Private.
| label: 'isPrivate', | |
| label: 'Is Private', |
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/db/models/Knowledgebase.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (childrenCounts > 0) { | ||
| throw new Error('Cannot change category. this is parent tag'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo: The error message reads 'Cannot change category. this is parent tag'. The 'this' should be capitalized and it might be clearer as 'Cannot change category: this is a parent tag' or 'Cannot change category because it is a parent tag'.
| throw new Error('Cannot change category. this is parent tag'); | |
| throw new Error('Cannot change category: this is a parent tag'); |
| export const KnowledgeBaseParentCategory = { | ||
| ...KnowledgeBaseCategory, | ||
|
|
||
| async childrens(category: ICategoryDocument, _args, { models }: IContext) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo: The function name childrens seems incorrect. Consider renaming it to children.
| authors: [User] | ||
| numOfArticles(status: String): Float | ||
|
|
||
| childrens: [KnowledgeBaseCategory] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo: The field name childrens appears to be a typo. Consider using children instead.
| childrens: [KnowledgeBaseCategory] | |
| children: [KnowledgeBaseCategory] |
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | |||
| import { User } from './extenstions'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typographical error: The word 'extenstions' is likely intended to be 'extensions'.
| import { User } from './extenstions'; | |
| import { User } from './extensions'; |
| export const TypeExtensions = ` | ||
| extend type User @key(fields: "_id") { | ||
| _id: String! @external | ||
| sampe: String |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The field name 'sampe' might be a typo. Consider renaming it to 'sample' if that is what is intended.
| qry = { erxesCustomerId: customer._id, portalId }; | ||
|
|
||
| user = await models.Users.findOne(qry); | ||
| if (user) throw new Error('user is already exists'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo: the error message 'user is already exists' should be corrected to 'user already exists'.
| if (user) throw new Error('user is already exists'); | |
| if (user) throw new Error('user already exists'); |
| icon: string; | ||
| topicId: string; | ||
| parentCategoryId?: string; | ||
| childrens?: Category[]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo: 'childrens' is non-standard. Consider renaming the property to 'children' in the Category interface.
| childrens?: Category[]; | |
| children?: Category[]; |
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/pages/sample-first/IndexPage.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ression Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 936c3ad in 1 minute and 34 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
265lines of code in5files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/graphql/resolvers/customResolvers/index.ts:1
- Draft comment:
Exporting an empty resolver object removes the previously defined 'User' resolver. Confirm this change is intentional and that any dependent GraphQL queries or related functionality are updated accordingly. If the 'User' resolver is no longer needed, consider also removing the now-unused 'extenstions.ts' file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment violates multiple rules: 1) It asks for confirmation of intention 2) It's speculative about dependent queries 3) It makes suggestions about file cleanup which is outside the scope. While the observation about resolver removal is correct, the comment doesn't indicate a clear required code change. The removal of a resolver could potentially break functionality - maybe this deserves a warning? Per the rules, we should assume the author knows what they're doing with removals, and we shouldn't make speculative comments about potential issues. If there are actual breaks, they would be caught by tests/build. The comment should be deleted as it primarily asks for confirmation and makes speculative suggestions without requiring any specific code changes.
Workflow ID: wflow_MU9xwI6qSJqhZtJE
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 940c3b2 in 1 minute and 35 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
157lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/customResolvers/category.ts:29
- Draft comment:
Minor style change: adding a trailing comma in the projection object improves readability and consistency. This is a harmless formatting update. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/customResolvers/category.ts:64
- Draft comment:
Renaming the function from 'childrens' to 'children' improves naming consistency. Verify that all references to this resolver are updated accordingly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Comment.ts:39
- Draft comment:
The new updateComment method correctly wraps the Mongoose call. Consider adding error handling (e.g. checking if the document was found) to maintain consistency with getComment. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
4. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/ArticleDrawer.tsx:366
- Draft comment:
The revised attachments section now enables replacing and removing individual attachments, which is a strong UX improvement. Using the array index as a key is acceptable if the attachments order remains stable. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
5. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/ArticleDrawer.tsx:460
- Draft comment:
The PDF attachment field appears misconfigured. The field is named 'pdfAttachment', but its value is accessed as field.value?.pdf?.url and updated as an object with a 'pdf' key. This may lead to type inconsistencies. It would be clearer to use the PDF attachment object directly (e.g. field.value?.url) and update with the expected structure. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_wDLoCHTCmDYwufS7
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 2607aa4 in 1 minute and 11 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Comment.ts:28
- Draft comment:
Changing the parameter type to IComment (from ICommentDocument) in createComment aligns with the interface definition. Ensure that any properties expected only on ICommentDocument (like auto-generated _id or timestamps) aren’t mistakenly required in the input, and validate inputs appropriately. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
Workflow ID: wflow_KdKDXdKB5VzlL8yR
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed a22e60e in 2 minutes and 9 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
12lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/utils.ts:343
- Draft comment:
Specify an explicit return type (string) for the escape function to enhance type safety. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% TypeScript can already infer the return type as string from the implementation. While explicit return types can be good practice for public APIs and documentation, they're not strictly necessary when the type is obvious. The function is simple enough that the implementation makes the return type clear. The comment isn't wrong - explicit types can improve maintainability and make the API contract clearer. Some style guides require explicit return types. However, this is a simple utility function where the return type is obvious from the implementation. The suggestion is more about style preference than fixing a real issue. While not incorrect, this comment is more of a style suggestion than a necessary change. The TypeScript compiler already provides type safety here through inference.
2. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/utils.ts:343
- Draft comment:
Ensure that unit tests cover 'escapeRegex' to verify that all special characters are properly escaped. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% The comment asks to "ensure" tests are added, which violates our rules about verification requests. However, suggesting unit tests for a new regex-related function could be valuable since regex escaping is error-prone. But the comment doesn't point out a specific issue - it's more of a general testing reminder. The function looks like a standard regex escape implementation that's likely already well-tested in other codebases. Maybe suggesting tests is being overly cautious here. While the implementation is standard, having tests for regex functionality is still valuable given its complexity and importance for correctness. The comment should be deleted because it starts with "Ensure that..." which violates our rules about verification requests. If there was a specific test case to suggest, that would be different.
Workflow ID: wflow_q5nkjn5b868Ov0il
You can customize
| return 'ok'; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const escapeRegex = (string: string) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider renaming escapeRegex to escapeRegExp for consistency with common naming conventions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed cc917dc in 1 minute and 51 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
31lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts:166
- Draft comment:
Good refactor: using a central constant for pagination (${cursorParams}) improves consistency. Ensure that the GraphQL type CURSOR_DIRECTION is properly defined elsewhere. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =50%<= threshold50%The comment suggests using a central constant for pagination, which is a specific code suggestion. However, the second part of the comment asks the author to ensure that a GraphQL type is properly defined, which violates the rule against asking the author to ensure something is done. The first part is useful, but the second part is not.
2. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts:177
- Draft comment:
The knowledgeBaseCategories query appears to be missing a comma between 'ids: [String]' and 'topicIds: [String]'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
3. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts:182
- Draft comment:
Ensure consistent formatting in the knowledgeBaseArticles query—verify that arguments (like between 'categoryIds: [String]' and 'articleIds:[String]') are clearly separated, even if only stylistic. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
4. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts:177
- Draft comment:
Typo note: In the GraphQL schema for knowledgeBaseCategories, the parameters appear concatenated. It readsids:[String] topicIds: [String]without a clear separator. Please verify whether a comma or an extra space is intended between the 'ids' and 'topicIds' arguments. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
5. backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts:182
- Draft comment:
Typographical suggestion: In the knowledgeBaseArticles query, parameters likearticleIds:[String]andsortField:Stringlack a space after the colon. For clarity and consistency, consider adding a space (e.g.,articleIds: [String],sortField: String). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_a2jn9mq3B8K23bx2
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (11)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts (1)
177-177: Fix syntax error in query definition.Missing comma between
ids:[String]andtopicIdsparameters.- knowledgeBaseCategories(${cursorParams},ids:[String] topicIds: [String], codes: [String],icon:String): [KnowledgeBaseCategory] + knowledgeBaseCategories(${cursorParams},ids:[String], topicIds: [String], codes: [String],icon:String): [KnowledgeBaseCategory]backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts (2)
18-22: Fix the flawed string replacement logic.The
key.replace('s', '')only replaces the first occurrence of 's', which would fail for keys like 'statuses' (would become 'tatuses' instead of 'status').- const field = key.replace('s', ''); + const field = key.slice(0, -1); // Remove last character
147-148: Fix confusing pagination behavior.The function accepts pagination parameters but returns an empty array when they're provided. This is misleading.
- // return paginate(categories, { page, perPage }); - return []; + // Pagination not implemented, returning all results + return categories;backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/db/models/Knowledgebase.ts (3)
32-32: Fix incorrect return type for removeDoc.The
removeDocmethod is declared withvoidreturn type but actually returns a Promise.- removeDoc(_id: string): void; + removeDoc(_id: string): Promise<any>;
169-169: Fix parameter name inconsistency.The
removeDocparameter should be_idfor consistency with other methods and the interface definition on line 32.- removeDoc(categoryId: string): void; + removeDoc(_id: string): void;
87-91: Remove redundant null check.The
getArticlemethod already throws an error if the article is not found, so this null check is redundant.const article = await models.KnowledgeBaseArticles.getArticle(_id); - if (!article) { - throw new Error('Article not found'); - } -backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/utils.ts (1)
6-7: Security concern: Switch to cryptographically secure randomness.The password generation uses
random()from erxes-api-shared which relies onMath.random(), making it cryptographically insecure for password generation.backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Users.ts (4)
666-667: Critical security issue: Use cryptographically secure random for verification codes.The verification code generation uses the insecure
random()function based onMath.random(), which is inappropriate for security-sensitive operations.
876-876: Security vulnerability in test user password generation.Using insecure randomness for password generation in test users.
910-911: Security vulnerability in invitation password generation.Using insecure randomness for password generation in user invitations.
575-581: 💡 Verification agent🧩 Analysis chain
Verify regex escaping in changePasswordWithCode.
Based on past review comments, this method should also use regex escaping for the phone parameter to prevent ReDoS attacks.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if escapeRegex is used in changePasswordWithCode method ast-grep --pattern 'changePasswordWithCode($_) { $$$ phone: { $regex: new RegExp($$$) } $$$ }'Length of output: 102
To get full visibility into whether
changePasswordWithCodeis handling regex-escaping forphone, let’s locate its definition and any related utilities:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # 1. Find the changePasswordWithCode method definition with context rg "changePasswordWithCode" -n -C3 # 2. Check for any direct use of `new RegExp` involving `phone` rg "new RegExp.*phone" -n -C3 # 3. Look for use of an escape helper (e.g., escapeRegex) anywhere in the repo rg "escapeRegex" -n -C3Length of output: 6243
Wrap
phoneinescapeRegexin changePasswordWithCode
To prevent ReDoS and keep consistency with other regex lookups, the rawphonevariable must be escaped before constructing theRegExp.Locations to update:
- File:
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Users.ts- Around lines 577–578 (inside
changePasswordWithCode)Suggested diff:
- { email: { $regex: new RegExp(`^${phone}$`, 'i') } }, - { phone: { $regex: new RegExp(`^${phone}$`, 'i') } }, + { email: { $regex: new RegExp(`^${escapeRegex(phone)}$`, 'i') } }, + { phone: { $regex: new RegExp(`^${escapeRegex(phone)}$`, 'i') } },This mirrors other queries in the file and ensures any special characters in
phoneare safely escaped.
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts (2)
25-25: Use optional chaining for safer property access.Apply optional chaining to safely handle cases where
args.searchValuemight be undefined.- if (args.searchValue && args.searchValue.trim()) { + if (args.searchValue?.trim()) {🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 25-25: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
67-67: Replace delete operator for better performance.The delete operator can impact performance. Use undefined assignment instead.
- delete selector.topicIds; + selector.topicIds = undefined;🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 67-67: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/db/models/Knowledgebase.ts (1)
42-147: Consider refactoring static-only classes to functions.Static analysis suggests avoiding classes that contain only static members. Consider refactoring to use plain functions or a namespace pattern for better performance and clarity.
For example, the Article class could be refactored to:
-export const loadArticleClass = (models: IModels) => { - class Article { - public static async getArticle(_id: string) { +export const loadArticleClass = (models: IModels) => { + const Article = { + async getArticle(_id: string) { // implementation - } + }, // other methods... - } - articleSchema.loadClass(Article); + }; + + // Load methods onto schema + Object.keys(Article).forEach(key => { + articleSchema.statics[key] = Article[key]; + }); + return articleSchema; -}; +};🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 42-147: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Comment.ts (1)
14-42: Consider refactoring to standalone functions for better maintainability.The static analysis tool suggests avoiding classes with only static members. Consider refactoring to standalone functions for improved code organization:
-export const loadCommentClass = (models: IModels) => { - class Comment { - public static async getComment(_id: string) { - // ... implementation - } - // ... other methods - } - commentSchema.loadClass(Comment); - return commentSchema; -}; +export const loadCommentClass = (models: IModels) => { + const commentMethods = { + async getComment(_id: string) { + // ... implementation + }, + // ... other methods + }; + + commentSchema.statics = commentMethods; + return commentSchema; +};🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 14-42: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/utils.ts (3)
25-27: Inconsistent error handling for duplicate users.The error message should be grammatically correct and handling should be consistent between customer and company flows:
- if (user) throw new Error('user is already exists'); + if (user) { + throw new Error('user already exists'); + }
32-44: Implement service integration for customer handling.The TODO comment indicates missing service integration. This could impact functionality if other services expect these notifications.
Do you want me to help implement the service messaging or create an issue to track this requirement?
213-302: Complete the createCard function implementation.The
createCardfunction is fully commented out, which may indicate missing functionality for card creation workflows.Would you like me to help implement this function or should this be removed if no longer needed?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/db/models/Knowledgebase.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/customResolvers/category.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/schemas/knowledgebase.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Comment.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Users.ts(1 hunks)backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/utils.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/ArticleDrawer.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/customResolvers/category.ts
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/ArticleDrawer.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Comment.ts (3)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/@types/comment.ts (2)
ICommentDocument(15-18)IComment(4-13)backend/plugins/content_api/src/connectionResolvers.ts (1)
IModels(40-51)backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/definitions/comment.ts (1)
commentSchema(4-15)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Users.ts
[error] 176-1334: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
[error] 245-245: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 358-358: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 359-359: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 465-465: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 469-469: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 491-491: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 503-503: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 512-512: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 553-553: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 592-592: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 598-598: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 609-609: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 639-639: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 654-654: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 656-656: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 689-689: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 774-774: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 775-775: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 835-835: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 836-836: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 853-853: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 862-862: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 880-880: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 915-915: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 1009-1009: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 1010-1010: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 1157-1157: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 1164-1164: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 1217-1217: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 1236-1236: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 1291-1291: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
[error] 1294-1294: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.
(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/db/models/Knowledgebase.ts
[error] 42-147: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
[error] 173-259: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
[error] 278-351: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/resolvers/queries.ts
[error] 25-25: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 67-67: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Comment.ts
[error] 14-42: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: core-ui
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Comment.ts (2)
39-41: Implementation successfully addresses previous feedback.The
updateCommentmethod has been properly implemented, resolving the missing implementation issue from previous reviews.
28-32: Parameter type is now consistent with interface declaration.The
createCommentmethod parameter type matches the interface declaration (IComment), resolving the previous type mismatch concern.backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/utils.ts (1)
343-345: Well-implemented regex escaping utility.The
escapeRegexfunction correctly escapes special regex characters, helping prevent ReDoS attacks and ensuring proper regex matching.backend/plugins/content_api/src/modules/portal/db/models/Users.ts (4)
796-803: Regex escaping properly implemented for login security.The login method correctly uses
escapeRegex()to prevent ReDoS attacks, showing good security practices.
1182-1195: Regex escaping properly implemented in loginWithoutPassword.The method correctly escapes regex special characters using the
escapeRegex()helper function.
234-344: Well-structured user creation with proper validation.The
createUsermethod implements comprehensive validation, portal configuration checking, and secure password handling. The custom fields integration via TRPC is well-designed.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 245-245: Using this in a static context can be confusing.
this refers to the class.
Unsafe fix: Use the class name instead.(lint/complexity/noThisInStatic)
435-441: Strong password validation implementation.The password complexity requirements are well-implemented with clear regex pattern and descriptive error message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed d853a33 in 1 minute and 42 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
74lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/queries.ts:54
- Draft comment:
Ensure the backend API supports the new pagination parameters (limit, cursor, and direction) replacing page and perPage. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to ensure that the backend API supports new parameters. This falls under asking the author to ensure behavior, which is against the rules.
2. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/queries.ts:72
- Draft comment:
Both TOPICS queries use the operation name 'knowledgeBaseTopics'. Consider giving them distinct names (e.g. 'ShortTopics' vs 'FullTopics') to avoid potential conflicts. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/queries.ts:133
- Draft comment:
Verify naming consistency: 'knowledgebaseCategories' (with lowercase 'b') is used in the CATEGORIES query; confirm if this is intentional compared to 'knowledgeBaseTopics'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
4. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/queries.ts:203
- Draft comment:
Ensure components consuming the ARTICLES query are updated to provide the new pagination variables (limit, cursor, direction). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_LJEkzHtjl2M59gds
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 4634422 in 1 minute and 1 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
16lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/fragments.ts:1
- Draft comment:
Good use of the gql template for a reusable fragment. Consider adding a brief file header comment explaining where and how this fragment is intended to be used. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_O1GKEtY25it9ngcJ
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useTopics.ts (1)
87-89: Consistent error handling approach.The error handling matches the pattern used in
useArticles, which is good for consistency. However, the same improvement suggestions apply here regarding production error handling.
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useArticles.ts (2)
6-31: Well-structured Article interface with minor inconsistency.The interface is comprehensive and well-typed. However, there's a potential inconsistency: both
createdUserandcreatedByfields exist, wherecreatedByappears to be a string ID whilecreatedUseris the full user object.Consider clarifying the relationship between these fields or if both are truly needed:
export interface Article { _id: string; title: string; code: string; summary: string; content: string; status: string; categoryId: string; createdDate: string; createdUser: { _id: string; username: string; email: string; }; publishedUser: { _id: string; username: string; email: string; details: { avatar: string; fullName: string; }; }; - createdBy: string; - modifiedBy: string; + modifiedBy?: string; // Consider making optional if not always present }
75-77: Consider improving error handling strategy.While console.error is useful for development, consider implementing a more robust error handling strategy for production use.
Consider returning error state or using a toast notification:
const loadMore = async () => { if (!endCursor) return; try { await fetchMore({ variables: { limit: ITEMS_PER_PAGE, cursor: endCursor, direction: 'forward', categoryIds, }, }); } catch (error) { console.error('Error loading more articles:', error); + // Consider: + // - Setting an error state to display to users + // - Using a toast notification system + // - Throwing the error to let components handle it } };frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useTopics.ts (3)
4-4: Inconsistent page size with useArticles hook.The page size is set to 10 items while
useArticlesuses 20. Consider standardizing pagination sizes across hooks for consistency.- const ITEMS_PER_PAGE = 10; + const ITEMS_PER_PAGE = 20; // Match useArticles for consistencyOr extract to a shared constant:
// In a shared constants file export const DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZE = 20;
62-69: Consider adding filtering capabilities like useArticles.The hook currently has no filtering options, unlike
useArticleswhich acceptscategoryIds. Consider if topics might need similar filtering capabilities.+ interface UseTopicsProps { + brandId?: string; + languageCode?: string; + } - export function useTopics(): UseTopicsResult { + export function useTopics({ + brandId, + languageCode, + }: UseTopicsProps = {}): UseTopicsResult { const { data, loading, fetchMore } = useQuery(TOPICS, { variables: { limit: ITEMS_PER_PAGE, cursor: null, direction: 'forward', + brandId, + languageCode, }, });
76-90: Identical pagination logic to useArticles - consider extracting.The
loadMorefunction is nearly identical to the one inuseArticles. Consider extracting this logic to a shared utility.Create a shared pagination hook:
// hooks/usePagination.ts export function usePagination<T>( query: DocumentNode, dataPath: string, itemsPerPage: number, additionalVariables?: Record<string, any> ) { // Extract common pagination logic }This would reduce code duplication and ensure consistent behavior across all paginated hooks.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/config.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/fragments.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useArticles.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useTopics.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/fragments.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/config.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useTopics.ts (1)
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/queries.ts (1)
TOPICS(72-112)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useArticles.ts (4)
4-4: Good choice for pagination size.The fixed page size of 20 items is reasonable for knowledge base articles and provides good balance between data transfer and user experience.
46-56: Proper Apollo Client integration with good default handling.The hook correctly uses Apollo's
useQuerywith appropriate variables and default parameter handling. The default empty object for props is a good practice.
58-61: Safe data extraction with proper fallbacks.Good use of optional chaining and fallback values to handle undefined responses safely.
63-78: Robust pagination implementation with error handling.The
loadMorefunction correctly handles the cursor-based pagination and includes proper error handling. The early return when no cursor exists prevents unnecessary API calls.frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useTopics.ts (3)
6-25: Well-structured Topic interface matching GraphQL schema.The interface correctly matches the GraphQL query structure from the relevant code snippet. The nested objects are properly typed.
27-35: Good Category interface with proper optional fields.The interface correctly handles optional fields like
parentCategoryIdandchildren, which is appropriate for hierarchical category structures.
37-51: Comprehensive ParentCategory interface.The interface is well-structured with proper nesting for the authors array and their details.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx (1)
97-99: Error handling still only logs to console without user feedback.This matches the previous review comment. The deletion operations should provide user feedback when they fail, not just log to the console.
Also applies to: 122-123
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx (2)
49-71: Simplify the complex URL synchronization logic.The
useEffecthook contains complex nested logic that could be simplified for better readability and maintainability.Consider extracting the URL synchronization logic into a custom hook or simplifying the conditional logic:
useEffect(() => { - if (!loading && topics.length > 0) { - const topicId = searchParams.get('topicId'); - - const firstTopic = topics[0]; - - const newParams: Record<string, string> = {}; - - if (!topicId && firstTopic) { - newParams.topicId = firstTopic._id; - } - - if (Object.keys(newParams).length > 0) { - setSearchParams((prev) => { - const updated = new URLSearchParams(prev.toString()); - Object.entries(newParams).forEach(([key, value]) => - updated.set(key, value), - ); - return updated; - }); - } - } + if (!loading && topics.length > 0 && !searchParams.get('topicId')) { + setSearchParams((prev) => { + const updated = new URLSearchParams(prev.toString()); + updated.set('topicId', topics[0]._id); + return updated; + }); + } }, [loading, searchParams, setSearchParams, topics]);
126-157: Extract dropdown menu components to reduce code duplication.The category and topic action dropdowns share similar structure and could be extracted into reusable components.
Consider extracting into separate components:
interface ActionDropdownProps { onEdit: () => void; onDelete: () => void; onAddChild: () => void; deleteText: string; addChildText: string; } const ActionDropdown: React.FC<ActionDropdownProps> = ({ onEdit, onDelete, onAddChild, deleteText, addChildText }) => ( <DropdownMenu> <DropdownMenu.Trigger className="ml-2 p-2"> <Ellipsis className="w-4 h-4" /> </DropdownMenu.Trigger> <DropdownMenu.Content> <DropdownMenu.Item onClick={onEdit}> Edit </DropdownMenu.Item> <DropdownMenu.Item onClick={onAddChild}> {addChildText} </DropdownMenu.Item> <DropdownMenu.Separator /> <DropdownMenu.Item onClick={onDelete} className="text-red-600"> {deleteText} </DropdownMenu.Item> </DropdownMenu.Content> </DropdownMenu> );Also applies to: 159-185
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
frontend/libs/ui-modules/src/modules/brands/components/SelectBrand.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/constants.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/CategoryDrawer.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/KnowledgeBase.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicDrawer.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useTopics.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/types.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/constants.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/KnowledgeBase.tsx
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicDrawer.tsx
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/CategoryDrawer.tsx
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useTopics.ts
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/types.ts
| @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ export const SelectBrand = React.forwardRef< | |||
| HTMLButtonElement, | |||
| SelectBrandProps | |||
| >(({ value, onValueChange, ...props }, ref) => { | |||
| console.log('value', value); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove debug console.log statement before merging.
This console.log statement appears to be a temporary debugging aid that should be removed before the code reaches production. Debug statements can clutter console output and are not meaningful to end users.
- console.log('value', value);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| console.log('value', value); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/libs/ui-modules/src/modules/brands/components/SelectBrand.tsx at
line 22, remove the console.log('value', value) statement as it is a debug log
that should not be present in production code to avoid cluttering the console
output.
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| await removeCategory({ | ||
| variables: { | ||
| _id: category._id, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add loading state and optimistic updates for category deletion.
The category deletion mutation lacks loading states and could benefit from optimistic updates for better user experience.
Consider adding loading states and cache updates:
await removeCategory({
variables: {
_id: category._id,
},
+ update(cache) {
+ // Remove the category from the cache
+ cache.evict({ id: cache.identify({ __typename: 'Category', _id: category._id }) });
+ cache.gc();
+ }
});Also consider adding a loading state to disable the UI during deletion.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await removeCategory({ | |
| variables: { | |
| _id: category._id, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| await removeCategory({ | |
| variables: { | |
| _id: category._id, | |
| }, | |
| update(cache) { | |
| // Remove the category from the cache | |
| cache.evict({ id: cache.identify({ __typename: 'Category', _id: category._id }) }); | |
| cache.gc(); | |
| } | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx
around lines 116 to 120, the category deletion mutation lacks a loading state
and optimistic UI updates. To fix this, add a loading state variable to disable
the UI during deletion, and implement optimistic updates by updating the Apollo
cache immediately to remove the category before the server responds. This
improves user experience by providing instant feedback and preventing duplicate
actions while the mutation is in progress.
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed ef10602 in 2 minutes and 45 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
1335lines of code in33files - Skipped
4files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
6draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. frontend/libs/erxes-ui/src/components/icon-picker.tsx:25
- Draft comment:
When dynamically accessing an icon via 'LucideIcons[value as keyof typeof icons]', consider adding a fallback in case the key doesn't exist to prevent runtime errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The value can only come from filteredIcons which is derived from Object.keys(icons). The onChange handler uses the same keys. TypeScript casting ensures type safety. The null fallback already exists. The suggested additional check seems redundant given the controlled flow of data. I could be wrong about the value always coming from filteredIcons - there might be other code paths setting the value prop that I can't see. Even if there are other code paths, the TypeScript type system and existing null check provide sufficient safety. The suggested change adds complexity without clear benefit. Delete the comment as it suggests adding unnecessary complexity when the existing type system and null check already provide adequate safety.
2. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/ArticleDrawer.tsx:117
- Draft comment:
Both 'refetchQueries' in the mutation configs and an explicit call to 'refetch()' are used in onCompleted handlers. This can lead to duplicate data refetching; consider choosing one strategy for updating the data. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/KnowledgeBase.tsx:16
- Draft comment:
The state variable 'selectedTopic' is declared but never used. Consider removing it to simplify the component. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx:239
- Draft comment:
When retrieving the icon component dynamically with 'LucideIcons[cat.icon as keyof typeof icons]', consider adding a safe fallback if the icon key does not exist, ensuring the UI doesn't break. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
5. frontend/plugins/sample_ui/module-federation.config.ts:25
- Draft comment:
Review the shared libraries configuration. Currently, only core libraries are shared and all others return false. Make sure this meets your application requirements for module federation dependencies. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is asking the PR author to review and ensure that the shared libraries configuration meets their application requirements. This falls under asking the author to double-check or ensure something, which is against the rules.
6. frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-first/IndexPage.tsx:39
- Draft comment:
It appears that the text 'Samplsdsadasdjakljkljklsade' may be a typographical error. Consider revising it to the intended content. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While this is clearly a typo, it's in a UI heading text which falls under pure frontend UI changes. According to the rules, we should not comment on UI or styling changes as we should assume the author made these changes intentionally. Even if it looks wrong, UI text content is the author's decision. The text really does look like an accident rather than intentional content. Maybe this is an exception to the UI rule since it's so obviously wrong? No - the rules clearly state not to comment on UI changes and to assume the author did UI changes correctly. We must follow this rule consistently. Delete this comment as it violates the rule about not commenting on UI changes, regardless of how the UI text looks.
Workflow ID: wflow_O6VF76rvHbeZzPSi
You can customize
|
|
||
| export function ArticleList({ onEditArticle }: ArticleListProps) { | ||
| const [searchParams] = useSearchParams(); | ||
| // const { data, loading } = useQuery(ARTICLES, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is commented-out query code. It is best practice to remove unused commented code to keep the file clean.
| // const { data, loading } = useQuery(ARTICLES, { |
| onClose, | ||
| refetch, | ||
| }: CategoryDrawerProps) { | ||
| const { toast } = useToast(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The toast instance from useToast is currently not used. Either remove it or utilize it for user feedback, e.g. when form submission fails.
| const { toast } = useToast(); |
| <Form {...form}> | ||
| <form | ||
| (error) => { | ||
| console.error(error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The form error callback only logs errors to the console. Consider providing user feedback (using toast notifications or form error messages) to improve UX on submission failure.
| console.error(error); | |
| toast.error("Submission failed. Please try again."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (6)
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/ArticleList.tsx (4)
8-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionReplace
anytype with proper Article interface.The TypeScript typing issue with
anytype for the article parameter remains unresolved from previous reviews.Apply this diff to add proper typing:
+interface Article { + _id: string; + title: string; + summary: string; + status: string; + createdUser?: { + details?: { + fullName: string; + }; + }; + createdDate: string; +} + interface ArticleListProps { - onEditArticle: (article: any) => void; + onEditArticle: (article: Article) => void; }
23-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd error state handling for the useArticles hook.
The component still lacks error handling despite previous feedback. Even though you've switched to using the
useArticleshook, you should handle potential errors from that hook.Apply this diff to add error handling:
- const { articles, loading } = useArticles({ + const { articles, loading, error } = useArticles({ categoryIds: [searchParams.get('categoryId') || ''], }); if (loading) { return ( <div className="flex justify-center items-center h-full"> <Spinner /> </div> ); } + if (error) { + return ( + <div className="flex justify-center items-center h-full"> + <p className="text-red-600">Failed to load articles: {error.message}</p> + </div> + ); + }
39-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionReplace
anytype in the map function with proper Article interface.The
anytype usage in the map function should be replaced with the proper Article interface for type safety.Apply this diff:
- {articles.map((article: any) => ( + {articles.map((article: Article) => (
66-68:⚠️ Potential issueAdd delete handler to the Delete Article menu item.
The delete functionality remains unimplemented from previous reviews. The Delete Article button needs to be connected to an appropriate mutation.
Apply this diff to add delete functionality:
- <DropdownMenu.Item className="text-red-600"> + <DropdownMenu.Item + className="text-red-600" + => handleDeleteArticle(article._id)} + > Delete Article </DropdownMenu.Item>You'll also need to implement the
handleDeleteArticlefunction and connect it to the appropriate GraphQL mutation (e.g.,removeArticle).frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx (2)
128-130: Improve error handling for deletion operations.The current error handling only logs errors to the console without providing user feedback for failed operations.
154-156: Improve error handling for deletion operations.The current error handling only logs errors to the console without providing user feedback for failed operations.
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-second/SettingsPage.tsx (1)
1-3: Consider enhancing the component structure and accessibility.While this is a functional placeholder, the component could benefit from better semantic structure and accessibility features for a settings page.
Consider this enhanced version:
-const Settings = () => { - return <div>Settings</div>; -}; +const Settings = () => { + return ( + <div> + <h1>Settings</h1> + {/* Add actual settings content here */} + </div> + ); +};frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample-second/Main.tsx (2)
4-8: Consider adding error handling for the lazy import.The lazy loading implementation is correct, but consider adding error handling for failed imports to improve user experience.
const SampleSecond = lazy(() => import('~/pages/sample-second/IndexPage').then((module) => ({ default: module.IndexPage, - })), + })).catch(() => ({ + default: () => <div>Error loading page</div> + })) );
10-18: Consider enhancing the loading fallback UI.The current fallback is functional but could provide better user feedback during loading.
return ( - <Suspense fallback={<div />}> + <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}> <Routes> <Route path="/" element={<SampleSecond />} /> </Routes> </Suspense> );frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample-first/Main.tsx (2)
4-8: Consider adding error handling for the lazy import.Same as the sample-second module, consider adding error handling for failed imports to improve robustness.
const SampleFirst = lazy(() => import('~/pages/sample-first/IndexPage').then((module) => ({ default: module.IndexPage, - })), + })).catch(() => ({ + default: () => <div>Error loading page</div> + })) );
10-18: Good consistency with other modules, consider enhancing fallback UI.The implementation is consistent with the sample-second module, which is excellent. Consider the same fallback improvement as suggested for the other module.
return ( - <Suspense fallback={<div />}> + <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}> <Routes> <Route path="/" element={<SampleFirst />} /> </Routes> </Suspense> );frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-first/IndexPage.tsx (1)
37-41: Clean up placeholder text.The h1 element contains placeholder text with random characters that should be replaced with meaningful content or proper placeholder text.
- <h1>Samplsdsadasdjakljkljklsade</h1> + <h1>Sample First Page</h1>Alternatively, consider adding proper page content or a more descriptive placeholder.
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx (1)
250-269: Consider improving accessibility of nested interactive elements.The current structure with Links inside SubButton and dropdown triggers may cause accessibility and keyboard navigation issues.
Consider restructuring to separate navigation and action concerns:
<div className="flex items-center justify-between w-full"> - <Link - to={`?topicId=${topic._id}&categoryId=${cat._id}`} - className="flex items-center gap-2 flex-grow" - > + <button + => navigate(`?topicId=${topic._id}&categoryId=${cat._id}`)} + className="flex items-center gap-2 flex-grow text-left" + > <span className="w-5 flex justify-center"> {IconComponent && ( <IconComponent className={cn( 'text-accent-foreground', isSubmenuActive && 'text-primary', )} /> )} </span> <span>{cat.title}</span> - </Link> + </button> {renderCategoryActions(cat)} </div>This separates navigation from the dropdown actions and improves keyboard accessibility.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/assets/fb.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgfrontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/assets/ig.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgfrontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/assets/messenger.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (34)
frontend/libs/erxes-ui/src/components/icon-picker.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/ArticleDrawer.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/ArticleList.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/CategoryDrawer.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/KnowledgeBase.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicDrawer.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/mutations.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/queries.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useArticles.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/eslint.config.js(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/module-federation.config.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/project.json(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/rspack.config.prod.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/rspack.config.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/bootstrap.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/config.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/index.html(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/main.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample-first/Main.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample-first/Settings.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample-second/Main.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample-second/Settings.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample/Main.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample/Settings.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-first/IndexPage.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-second/IndexPage.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-second/SettingsPage.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/remote-entry.ts(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/widgets/Widgets.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/tsconfig.app.json(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)frontend/plugins/sample_ui/tsconfig.spec.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (19)
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/main.ts
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample-first/Settings.tsx
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/remote-entry.ts
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample/Main.tsx
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/rspack.config.prod.ts
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/widgets/Widgets.tsx
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/index.html
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/bootstrap.tsx
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/tsconfig.app.json
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample-second/Settings.tsx
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/module-federation.config.ts
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/tsconfig.spec.json
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/rspack.config.ts
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/tsconfig.json
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/jest.config.ts
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/config.ts
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/eslint.config.js
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-second/IndexPage.tsx
- frontend/plugins/sample_ui/project.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/hooks/useArticles.ts
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/KnowledgeBase.tsx
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/ArticleDrawer.tsx
- frontend/libs/erxes-ui/src/components/icon-picker.tsx
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/CategoryDrawer.tsx
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicDrawer.tsx
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/mutations.ts
- frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/graphql/queries.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-first/IndexPage.tsx (5)
frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-second/IndexPage.tsx (1)
IndexPage(5-39)frontend/libs/ui-modules/src/modules/header/components/PageHeader.tsx (1)
PageHeader(186-190)frontend/libs/erxes-ui/src/components/breadcrumb.tsx (1)
Breadcrumb(109-116)frontend/libs/erxes-ui/src/components/button.tsx (1)
Button(43-57)frontend/libs/erxes-ui/src/components/separator.tsx (1)
Separator(50-52)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/modules/sample/Settings.tsx (1)
1-7: Good semantic structure for a sample component.The component properly uses semantic HTML with an h1 header, which is appropriate for a settings page. The structure is clean and follows React best practices for a sample/demo component.
frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-first/IndexPage.tsx (3)
1-3: LGTM! Clean import statements.All imports are properly used within the component and follow standard conventions.
5-8: LGTM! Well-structured component.The component follows React best practices with proper functional component syntax and appropriate CSS classes for layout.
25-35: Verify duplicate route usage.Both action buttons link to the same route "/settings/sample" (lines 14 and 27). This may be unintentional, as the similar component in
sample-second/IndexPage.tsxuses different routes for different buttons.Consider if these buttons should navigate to different settings pages or if the duplication is intentional.
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx (3)
1-19: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The import structure is clean and includes all necessary dependencies for the component's functionality.
21-27: LGTM! Clean interface definition.The props interface is well-structured with appropriate types and clear naming conventions.
29-88: LGTM! Solid component implementation.The TopicList component properly handles URL parameter synchronization, loading states, and topic rendering. The useEffect implementation correctly manages dependencies and ensures a topic is always selected.
| </Breadcrumb.List> | ||
| </Breadcrumb> | ||
| <Separator.Inline /> | ||
| <PageHeader.LikeButton /> |
Fix incorrect component name.
The component name PageHeader.LikeButton doesn't match the available API. Based on the PageHeader component definition, it should be PageHeader.FavoriteToggleButton.
- <PageHeader.LikeButton />
+ <PageHeader.FavoriteToggleButton />📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <PageHeader.LikeButton /> | |
| - <PageHeader.LikeButton /> | |
| + <PageHeader.FavoriteToggleButton /> |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/plugins/sample_ui/src/pages/sample-first/IndexPage.tsx at line 23,
the component name PageHeader.LikeButton is incorrect. Replace
PageHeader.LikeButton with PageHeader.FavoriteToggleButton to match the correct
component name from the PageHeader API.
| <IconComponent | ||
| className={cn( | ||
| 'text-accent-foreground', | ||
| isSubmenuActive && 'text-primary', | ||
| )} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect variable usage for subcategory styling.
The code uses isSubmenuActive (parent category state) instead of isSubActive (subcategory state) for styling the subcategory icon, causing incorrect visual feedback.
Apply this fix:
{IconComponent && (
<IconComponent
className={cn(
'text-accent-foreground',
- isSubmenuActive && 'text-primary',
+ isSubActive && 'text-primary',
)}
/>
)}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <IconComponent | |
| className={cn( | |
| 'text-accent-foreground', | |
| isSubmenuActive && 'text-primary', | |
| )} | |
| /> | |
| {IconComponent && ( | |
| <IconComponent | |
| className={cn( | |
| 'text-accent-foreground', | |
| isSubActive && 'text-primary', | |
| )} | |
| /> | |
| )} |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx
around lines 292 to 297, the icon component for the subcategory is incorrectly
using the variable isSubmenuActive for styling, which reflects the parent
category state. Replace isSubmenuActive with isSubActive to correctly apply
styling based on the subcategory's active state, ensuring accurate visual
feedback.
| await removeCategory({ | ||
| variables: { | ||
| _id: category._id, | ||
| }, | ||
| }).then(() => { | ||
| refetch(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor mutation handling for consistency and better UX.
The category deletion uses .then() pattern instead of consistent async/await, and lacks loading state management and optimistic updates.
Consider this improved implementation:
await removeCategory({
variables: {
_id: category._id,
},
- }).then(() => {
- refetch();
- });
+ update(cache) {
+ // Optimistically remove category from cache
+ cache.evict({ id: cache.identify({ __typename: 'Category', _id: category._id }) });
+ cache.gc();
+ }
+ });
+
+ await refetch();Also consider adding a loading state to prevent multiple simultaneous deletions.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await removeCategory({ | |
| variables: { | |
| _id: category._id, | |
| }, | |
| }).then(() => { | |
| refetch(); | |
| }); | |
| await removeCategory({ | |
| variables: { | |
| _id: category._id, | |
| }, | |
| update(cache) { | |
| // Optimistically remove category from cache | |
| cache.evict({ id: cache.identify({ __typename: 'Category', _id: category._id }) }); | |
| cache.gc(); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| await refetch(); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
frontend/plugins/content_ui/src/modules/knowledgebase/components/TopicList.tsx
around lines 147 to 153, the category deletion mutation uses a .then() promise
pattern instead of async/await, and it does not handle loading state or
optimistic UI updates. Refactor the mutation call to use async/await syntax, add
a loading state to disable the delete action while the mutation is in progress
to prevent multiple simultaneous deletions, and implement optimistic updates to
immediately reflect the deletion in the UI before the server response.
Summary by Sourcery
Add a new content plugin for managing a Knowledge Base and client portal, including both backend API and frontend UI components.
New Features:
Enhancements:
Important
Introduces a comprehensive content management system for a Knowledge Base with new backend and frontend plugins, GraphQL integration, and enhanced UI components.
content_apiplugin for backend with GraphQL schemas, resolvers, and models for knowledge base management.content_uiplugin for frontend with React components for CRUD operations on topics, categories, and articles.slugifydependency and updatedpnpmlock file.This description was created by
for ef10602. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores