-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Paper results finalizing #102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- Plot fixes - Small path fixes in notebooks - Reran TRCWA vs GRCWA notebook
@@ -65,7 +75,7 @@ def compute_spectrum_fdtd(permittivity, cfg: DotMap): | |||
cfg, | |||
include_object=False, | |||
wavelength=physical_wavelengths[i], | |||
permittivity=permittivity[:, :, :, i], | |||
permittivity=None, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why remove the permittivity?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh its only for the include objecet = False part, I see
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I just wanted to make clear and sure that the value is not used
nidn/fdtd_integration/init_fdtd.py
Outdated
detector_y -= cfg.FDTD_gridpoints_from_material_to_detector | ||
|
||
logger.trace( | ||
"Placing detector at " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Placing detectors at? Both are x coordinate of transmission or reflection detector
Description
Summary of changes
Resolved Issues
How Has This Been Tested?
Ran tests, ran notebooks