fix(atlar): fix json tag with backward compatibility #366
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the configuration for the "atlar" plugin by changing the JSON tag for the Changes
P 8000 oem
Tip ⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. If you are seeing this consistently it is likely a permissions issue. Please check "Moderation" -> "Code review limits" under your organization settings.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
internal/connectors/plugins/public/atlar/config.go (2)
11-11: Fix JSON formatting in comment.The comment contains malformed JSON with extra closing curly braces at the end (
}}}).Remove the extra closing braces to ensure the JSON is properly formatted.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
11-14: Document the purpose of the configuration comment.The newly added comment contains a JSON-like configuration structure, but its purpose isn't clear. Is this intended to be documentation, an example configuration, or something else?
Consider adding a brief explanation before the JSON to clarify its purpose, such as:
+// Example configuration for the Atlar plugin: // {"name":"atlar","baseUrl":"https://api.atlar.com",...}🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🛑 Comments failed to post (2)
internal/connectors/plugins/public/atlar/config.go (2)
11-11:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove API credentials from code comments.
The comment contains what appears to be real API credentials (accessKey and secret). These should never be committed to the codebase as they could lead to security breaches if the code is made public.
Replace the credentials with placeholder values like
"<YOUR_ACCESS_KEY>"and"<YOUR_SECRET>". Also, consider documenting that these values should be retrieved from environment variables or a secure configuration store.-// {"name":"atlar","baseUrl":"https://api.atlar.com","pollingPeriod":"120s","transferInitiationStatusPollingPeriod":"120s","accessKey":"7bRhJPLMzTZK8xohVUVc","secret":"YgtdOM_7gRIqgSySivMpJA8Nu8SXWvzOL9UJm5GdJnoHELQq_s2Zdxkz3ls3mqpx9Tyi","pageSize":15}}} +// {"name":"atlar","baseUrl":"https://api.atlar.com","pollingPeriod":"120s","transferInitiationStatusPollingPeriod":"120s","accessKey":"<YOUR_ACCESS_KEY>","secret":"<YOUR_SECRET>","pageSize":15}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// {"name":"atlar","baseUrl":"https://api.atlar.com","pollingPeriod":"120s","transferInitiationStatusPollingPeriod":"120s","accessKey":"<YOUR_ACCESS_KEY>","secret":"<YOUR_SECRET>","pageSize":15}🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
14-14: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Consider adding backward compatibility for JSON field name change.
The JSON tag for BaseURL has been changed from "baseURL" to "baseUrl". While this change aligns with the naming convention used in the comment, it could potentially break backward compatibility with existing configurations.
Since the PR title mentions "backward compatibility", ensure that there's a mechanism to handle both the old and new field names during deserialization. Consider using a custom unmarshaler or adding a fallback field.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there's any backward compatibility handling for the baseURL/baseUrl field rg -A 5 -B 5 "UnmarshalJSON|json.Unmarshal.*Config|baseURL" --type go internal/connectors/plugins/public/atlar/Length of output: 4911
Backward Compatibility for JSON Field Change Required
The change from
"baseURL"to"baseUrl"in the JSON tag of theBaseURLfield ininternal/connectors/plugins/public/atlar/config.gohas been verified to lack any fallback mechanism. Notably, the tests inplugin_test.govalidate the presence of the legacy"baseURL"field, suggesting that existing configurations might break due to this change.
- Issue: The PR alters the JSON tag without implementing backward compatibility, meaning that incoming JSON using the legacy
"baseURL"won’t be correctly unmarshaled.- Suggestion: Implement a custom unmarshaler for the configuration struct (or an equivalent fallback mechanism) that checks for both
"baseURL"and"baseUrl". This will ensure seamless handling of both new and legacy configurations.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #366 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 73.44% 73.43% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 538 538
Lines 26620 26620
==
8000
========================================
- Hits 19552 19549 -3
- Misses 6054 6057 +3
Partials 1014 1014 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Fixes PMNT-63