8000 rest2html: treat referenced wrapped images in base document as inlined by jdknight · Pull Request #1935 · github/markup · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

rest2html: treat referenced wrapped images in base document as inlined #1935

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jdknight
Copy link
@jdknight jdknight commented Mar 4, 2025

docutils will only add newlines around images it believes are inlined. For images held in references, it checks the parent of the reference if its a TextElement to consider it inlined. Since a document is not a TextElement type, it will wrap an image with newlines. For GitHub output, this is not desired and will result in the extra whitespace being rendered with a reference's decorative line. To avoid this, always strip any appended suffixes for images in this scenario.


There are a various GitHub projects which reveal the issue. For example, Sphinx's README.rst shows this issue:

With the changes made in this merge request, the following shows a rendering of HTML before and after the change:

docutils will only add newlines around images it believes are inlined.
For images held in references, it checks the parent of the reference if
its a `TextElement` to consider it inlined. Since a document is not a
`TextElement` type, it will wrap an image with newlines. For GitHub
output, this is not desired and will result in the extra whitespace
being rendered with a reference's decorative line. To avoid this,
always strip any appended suffixes for images in this scenario.

Signed-off-by: James Knight <git@jdknight.me>
Copy link
github-actions bot commented Jul 2, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jul 2, 2025
@jdknight
Copy link
Author
jdknight commented Jul 3, 2025

!unstale

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Jul 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0