8000 Introduce demand in constraint system by arkocal · Pull Request #1746 · goblint/analyzer · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Introduce demand in constraint system #1746

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 19, 2025

Conversation

arkocal
Copy link
Contributor
@arkocal arkocal commented May 16, 2025

This implements #1743 following #1745 .

The focus is on the constraint systems here. Another PR should follow for renaming and possibly simplifying the lifters. When td3 is able to handle demand, some lifters can be removed.

@arkocal arkocal requested a review from michael-schwarz May 16, 2025 13:47
@arkocal arkocal added feature performance Analysis time, memory usage parallel Parallel Goblint labels May 16, 2025
@michael-schwarz
Copy link
Member

tests/unit/solver/solverTest.ml probably also needs to be adapted, it fails to compile.

@arkocal
Copy link
Contributor Author
arkocal commented May 19, 2025

tests/unit/solver/solverTest.ml probably also needs to be adapted, it fails to compile.

3e642fc

@arkocal arkocal requested a review from michael-schwarz May 19, 2025 07:56
@arkocal arkocal requested a review from sim642 May 19, 2025 11:46
@sim642 sim642 added this to the v2.6.0 milestone May 19, 2025
@michael-schwarz michael-schwarz merged commit 570c749 into goblint:master May 19, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sim642 sim642 sim642 approved these changes

@michael-schwarz michael-schwarz michael-schwarz approved these changes

Labels
feature parallel Parallel Goblint performance Analysis time, memory usage
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0