8000 feat: [#285] Validation supports the regex role by kkumar-gcc · Pull Request #638 · goravel/framework · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

feat: [#285] Validation supports the regex role #638

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8000 Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

feat: [#285] Validation supports the regex role #638

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

kkumar-gcc
Copy link
Member
@kkumar-gcc kkumar-gcc commented Sep 10, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

📑 Description

Closes goravel/goravel#285

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced comprehensive tests for regex-based validation rules, ensuring accurate handling of valid and invalid email and phone number formats, as well as nested structures.
    • Enhanced test coverage to include scenarios for missing regex patterns and panic situations.

✅ Checks

  • Added test cases for my code

@kkumar-gcc kkumar-gcc requested a review from a team as a code owner September 10, 2024 18:47
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Sep 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new test function, TestRule_Regex, in the validation_test.go file to validate regex-based validation rules. It includes multiple test cases that assess various scenarios, such as successful and erroneous validations for email and phone number formats, as well as handling nested structures and missing regex patterns. The function enhances the testing suite by ensuring comprehensive coverage of regex validation logic.

Changes

Files Change Summary
validation/validation_test.go Added a new test function TestRule_Regex to validate regex rules with multiple test cases.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Support regex validation (Feature #285) ✅
Add test cases for regex validation functionality ✅
Update documentation for regex validation ❌ No documentation updates included.

Tip

Announcements
  • The review status is no longer posted as a separate comment when there are no actionable or nitpick comments. In such cases, the review status is included in the walkthrough comment.
  • We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs: Walkthrough comment now includes a list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs in the walkthrough comment. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).
Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4fd3f63 and c0d183c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • validation/validation_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
validation/validation_test.go (1)

198-309: Excellent work on the comprehensive test function for regex validation!

The TestRule_Regex function is well-structured and covers a wide range of scenarios for testing regex validation. It includes test cases for successful validation, error handling, nested structures, missing regex patterns, and different regex patterns.

The use of the Case struct to encapsulate test case descriptions and setup functions enhances readability and maintainability. The assertions made in each test case ensure the correctness of the validation results.

Overall, this test function provides thorough coverage of the regex validation functionality and follows best practices for testing in Go.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov Codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Sep 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.95%. Comparing base (4fd3f63) to head (c0d183c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #638   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.95%   69.95%           
======================
8000
=================
  Files         184      184           
  Lines       11267    11267           
=======================================
  Hits         7882     7882           
  Misses       2815     2815           
  Partials      570      570

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

hwbrzzl
hwbrzzl approved these changes Sep 11, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor
@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect

@kkumar-gcc kkumar-gcc merged commit 413083b into master Sep 11, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@kkumar-gcc kkumar-gcc deleted the kkumar-gcc/#285 branch September 11, 2024 01:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl hwbrzzl approved these changes

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🚀 Review Ready
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

✨ [Feature] Validation supports the regex role
2 participants
@kkumar-gcc @hwbrzzl
0